Should a Constitutional Amendment Protect Parental Rights? (S. Joint Res. 48)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is S. Joint Res. 48?
(Updated May 13, 2020)
This resolution would propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees certain parental rights. The amendment would certify parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children. It would add that the parental right to direct their child’s education includes the right to choose — as an alternative to public education — public education, private, religious, or home schools and the right to make reasonable choices within public schools for one’s child.
Neither the U.S. government nor any state could infringe these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served. No treaty nor any source of international law could be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply the rights guaranteed by this amendment. Parental rights guaranteed by the amendment could not be denied or abridged on account of disability. This amendment could not be construed as applying to a parental action or decision that would end life.
Because it proposes a constitutional amendment, after this resolution’s passage by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress it would have to be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 states) to amend the U.S. Constitution.
Argument in favor
Parents have an inherent, natural right to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children and the U.S. Constitution should protect parents from having that right infringed by the government.
Argument opposed
There is no need for a parental rights amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the court system can be relied upon to appropriately balance the rights of parents versus the interest of the government.
Impact
Children and their parents; state legislatures; and the U.S. Constitution.
Cost of S. Joint Res. 48
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) touted his proposal as a way to clearly protect the rights of parents as they raise their children by enshrining those rights into the Constitution:
“The rights of parents are under assault from bureaucrats who think they know what’s best for someone else’s child. Parental rights do not and should not end when the child leaves their home.”
This legislation has the support of five cosponsors in the Senate, all of whom are Republicans.
Media:
-
Sponsoring Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Press Release
-
Heartland Institute (In Favor)
-
ParentalRights.org (In Favor)
-
PJ Media (In Favor)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: monkeybusinessimages / iStock)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...