Punishing Healthcare Providers For Not Trying to Save Infants Who Survive Attempted Abortions (S. 130)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is S. 130?
(Updated February 11, 2021)
This bill ― the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act ― would require healthcare providers to provide “reasonably diligent and conscientious care” to an infant born alive following an attempted abortion. Providers would have to take the appropriate steps to save the life of an infant given its age and health, and immediately transport and admit the infant to a hospital. If a healthcare provider fails to comply with these requirements they could be punished with fines or up to five years in prison, or be tried for murder if their actions lead to the death of a born alive infant. The mother of the child that is born alive could not be prosecuted under this legislation, as it only applies to healthcare providers.
If a healthcare provider, or employee of a physician’s office, hospital, or abortion clinic knows about a failure to comply with the requirements established by this bill, they would be legally responsible for reporting the incident to a state or federal law enforcement agency.
Women who give birth to born alive infants could file civil suits against healthcare providers and could be awarded:
Compensation for physical and psychological injury;
Statutory damages for up to three times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion; and
Punitive damages.
The loser of a civil suit would be required to pay the winner’s attorney’s fees.
Argument in favor
Infants born following an attempted abortion have rights under the Constitution just like any other person. Healthcare providers who fail to provide the necessary medical care should be held criminally accountable and charged with murder if the infant dies.
Argument opposed
Partisan politics and fear-mongering, rather than legitimate legal or medical needs, are the motivation behind this bill. It would deter abortion providers from using procedures to keep a fetus intact so its tissue can be used for research.
Impact
Women seeking abortions, born alive infants, health care providers, and federal and state law enforcement.
Cost of S. 130
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) introduced this bill to protect infants born alive after an attempted abortion in response to a bill to expand access to late-term abortions under consideration in Virginia, which the state’s governor spoke in favor of:
“Here’s just one of the ugly nuggets from Ralph Northam, the Governor of Virginia. “If the mother is in labor the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated, if that’s what the mother and the family desired and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”...
Everyone in the Senate ought to be able to say unequivocally that killing that little baby is wrong. This doesn’t take any political courage. And, if you can’t say that, if there’s a member of this body that can’t say that, there may be lots of work you can do in the world but you shouldn’t be here. You should get the heck out of any calling in public life where you pretend to care about the most vulnerable among us. There should be no politics here that are right vs. left, or Republican vs. Democrat. This is the most basic thing you could be talking about. We’re talking about a little baby born alive and we have a public official in America defending the idea “Well, you could have a debate about killing her.””
Northam’s communications director attempted to clarify the governor’s comments in the following statement (the VA bill has since been tabled by the state House):
“No woman seeks a third trimester abortion except in the case of tragic or difficult circumstances, such as a nonviable pregnancy or in the event of severe fetal abnormalities, and the governor’s comments were limited to the actions physicians would take in the event that a woman in those circumstances went into labor.”
This legislation has the support of 40 cosponsors in the Senate, all of whom are Republicans. In the 115th Congress, the GOP-controlled House passed a similar bill on a 241-183 party-line vote, but it stalled in the Senate.
Of Note: The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002 after unanimously passing Congress, clarifies that for the purpose of federal law the terms “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” include every infant born alive — whether the birth is the result of labor, c-section, or induced abortion. It doesn’t contain its own criminal penalties or enforcement mechanisms to hold abortion providers accountable for failing to provide medical attention and care to infants born alive.
According to the Guttmacher Institute there are 24 states that impose abortion bans after a certain number of weeks, 17 of which ban abortion at about 20 weeks post-fertilization or its equivalent of 22 weeks on the grounds that the fetus can feel pain. Globally, only the U.S., Canada, North Korea, China, Singapore, Vietnam, and the Netherlands allow elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy according to Politifact.
Between 8,000 and 15,000 late-term abortions (at or after 21 weeks of gestation) are performed in the U.S. each year according to 2015 data gathered by the Centers for Disease Control and the 2008 Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health report.
While it’s often said that women who seek late-term abortions do so because of fetal abnormalities or danger to their life if the fetus was delivered, a 2013 study by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco noted that “data suggest most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.” Of the women in the study seeking late-term abortions 43% reported that they didn’t realize they were pregnant and 37% had trouble deciding whether to have an abortion. Once they decided to have an abortion, 65% reported the procedure’s cost as a barrier.
In some instances, abortions fail and an infant is born alive — although data on the number of survivors is difficult to come by in the U.S. In 2015, the House Judiciary Committee heard testimony from Melissa Ohden, the founder of the Abortion Survivors Network.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: iStock.com / Pablo_K)The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...