Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

On This Date: Obama Signed the Dodd-Frank Act Into Law

by Countable | Updated on 7.21.18

On July 21, 2010 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (or Dodd-Frank for short) was signed into law by President Barack Obama following an economic crisis that required a $700 billion bailout of the financial services industry. The 848-page legislation put forward sweeping regulatory reforms for the financial services industry that affected everything from mortgages to securities to how the government handles insolvent banks or insurance companies. Not only that, it also directed new and existing federal agencies to write thousands of pages of new regulations for the financial sector.

Why was it needed?

With banks closing and the economy plummeting in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Congress wanted to do something to not just fix the problem, but prevent it from happening again.

The story of the financial crisis that triggered what’s become known as the Great Recession begins with subprime mortgages. Subprime mortgages are made to borrowers who may have a poor credit score or can’t make a 20 percent down payment on their home, and as economic conditions worsened more of these borrowers couldn’t pay and started to default. This not only negatively impacted the banks that made the loans initially, but it also hurt the banks that invested in mortgage-backed securities (basically a bundle of mortgages, some of which were subprime), which lost value as defaults mounted.

While banks were losing money due to subprime mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, insurance companies were losing money due to what are known as credit default swaps.A credit default swap is essentially insurance for banks that buy securities; it protects them in case the security they’re buying isn’t stable and its issuer goes into default. Banks had invested in these to hedge against the declining value of mortgage-backed securities, so insurance companies were also destabilized by the crisis.

The insolvency of several banks and insurance companies (plus General Motors and several federal housing agencies) prompted a $700 billion federal bailout, which advocates claimed was needed to prevent a catastrophic failure of the financial system. The thinking was that those institutions were “too big to fail” and if they did, it would ripple through the financial sector and the U.S. economy as a whole. As a result, there was outcry for increased regulations on the financial sector to prevent this kind of madness from happening again.

What did it do?

Initially proposed by President Obama in June 2009, Congress considered several similar bills before settling on the version that became the Dodd-Frank Act (named after then-Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) and then-Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT)). While Dodd-Frank ultimately passed both chambers of Congress, it did so on party line votes — 237-192 in the House and 60-39 in the Senate, with only three Republicans in each chamber voting in favor.

As mentioned previously, Dodd-Frank was a huge piece of legislation that covered nearly every aspect of the financial sector. But it did focus in particular on several areas, including:

  • Addressing financial instability and liquidating failed banks and insurance companies;
  • Regulatory protections for investors;
  • Mortgage reforms aimed at reducing abusive lending practices.

In order to reduce the threat “too big to fail” institutions posed to the economy, Dodd-Frank created a Financial Stability Oversight Council that could vote to designate financial services companies as being “systemically important” and subject them to additional oversight. It also clarified that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) would be responsible for liquidating failed banks, but that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would assist in handling investment banks, while the Federal Insurance Office would handle the insurance companies. The Federal Reserve could also put any qualified financial institution through liquidation.

Also included in the legislation was the Volcker Rule, which prohibits commercial banks (like those where you’d open a checking or savings account) from engaging in speculative, and potentially risky, investments that aren’t beneficial to their customers.

Dodd-Frank increased regulations on asset-backed securities (which are backed by mortgages, receivables from credit cards, etc.) like those that triggered the financial crisis. The law required banks to shoulder five percent of their credit risk and also established risk retention requirements for mortgage lenders. These provisions were aimed at deterring lenders from lowering their lending standards and signing off on risky loans that may not be repaid. It also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which regulates consumer financial products and services and offers advice and assistance to consumers.

It also included provisions requiring mortgage lenders to abide by minimum standards for “qualified mortgages” — which are defined as loans that don’t increase the principal balance of the loan or involve points and fees exceeding 3 percent of the loan amount. Dodd-Frank also placed restrictions on how bankers are compensated for originating loans and requires them to verify a borrower’s ability to repay. If a lender fails to check on that, or the mortgage has more than 3 percent fees or other exploitative terms, a borrower can use that as a defense in foreclosure proceedings.

Dodd-Frank called on federal agencies to write some regulations on their own, in addition to the provisions of the legislation passed by Congress. As a result, those agencies have issued 631 regulatory releases according to the law firm DavisPolk, and those agencies have also published nearly 22,300 pages of rules in the Federal Register (over 13,000 of which were final rules) and none of which were approved by Congress.

Did it work?

That depends on who you ask. Dodd-Frank has remained controversial since its passage, as evidenced by Republicans trying to roll it back and Democrats offering a spirited defense of the law’s efforts to punish financial services companies for their wrongs.

Among the critiques levelled at Dodd-Frank are that its regulations have prevented banks from lending as much as they would have otherwise, which has impeded economic growth. Opponents of the law also cite rules aimed at larger firms that are instead making compliance difficult for smaller community banks.

Others insist that Dodd-Frank didn’t go far enough, believing that it should have broken up “too big to fail” banks. Critics also point to the fact that Dodd-Frank did nothing to deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — two government-sponsored entities that create and sell mortgage-backed securities. They received $116 and $71.3 billion, respectively, in a bailout of their own which hasn’t yet been repaid.

Advocates for Dodd-Frank believe that, while imperfect, the safeguards put in place by the legislation have helped to stabilize financial markets and prevent the sort of excessive risk taking that caused the financial crisis. They claim that it allowed trading in asset-backed securities and other derivatives to be brought under control while ensuring that borrowers are able to repay their mortgage loans.

Whatever your opinion about Dodd-Frank, it will likely remain a political flashpoint for the foreseeable future. A bipartisan overhaul of its community bank rules was signed into law in May 2018 by President Donald Trump — and further reforms may be in store.

― Eric Revell

(Photo Credit: Leader Nancy Pelosi via Flickr / Public Domain)

Countable

Written by Countable

Leave a comment
(142)
  • PLD
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Please, continue the safeguards of Dodd-Frank. Consumers need protections that the current administration only see for big business and the 1%.

    Like (71)
    Follow
    Share
  • Joan
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Dodd-Frank was installed for a reason; to prevent the foolish bank practices that nearly led to another depression. We should have learned from this, but a new administration seeks only to eliminate protections so that the wealthy will have greater opportunity. This may be another example of "trickle down economics", which did not work. It is even less likely to work now than in the day of Reagan.

    Like (44)
    Follow
    Share
  • Dave
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Trump and the GOP are getting rid of safety nets, equality and safe guards. This is what made America great, so far trump and the GOP are going to make America fail again and the world. This is a buyers dream. The GOP likes self regulation, we have seen how well that has worked!

    Like (41)
    Follow
    Share
  • DrCindyBean
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Keep Dodd-Frank. We need these protections.

    Like (29)
    Follow
    Share
  • Regina
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Keep Dodd Frank.Safety nets help secure our economy.

    Like (22)
    Follow
    Share
  • Laura
    07/21/2018
    ···

    I studied the Dodd-Frank Act for my master’s thesis. The Dodd-Frank Act provided common sense safeguards and protections for consumers. However, that grand ole party (GOP) does not want to protect consumers, at the time prior to the banking bailout, Republicans lobbied three times as much as Democrats for consumer credit card and consumer banking predatory standards. So those that wanted to keep up with the Joneses could never keep up with the high costs of their percentage rates. The fact that this administration, and our fantastic (sic) representatives have been tearing the Dodd-Frank Act apart is another travesty, that another Democrat will have to clean up during another administration and after another bank bailout. Think about that when your voting! Vote blue!

    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
  • Jennifer
    07/22/2018
    ···

    All one needs to know about Dodd-Frank is this: “...it also directed new and existing federal agencies to write THOUSANDS OF PAGES of new regulations for the financial sector.” The Lefties never met a regulation they didn’t like. Oh, and one more thing; Predating the sub prime mortgage meltdown was the community banking philosophy pushed on banks by the left. That philosophy is based on the principle that everyone “deserves” to own their own house. It didn’t matter that they didn’t work to save up for a down payment. If banks didn’t lend to these people,they were often targeted with charges of racism. So the loans went out in droves as “zero down payment loans.” Many of these borrowers bought well beyond their means. When the economy struggled, these borrowers had no skin in the game and were able to just walk away. This set the ball in motion and the mass defaults on mortgages then affected housing markets and even people with skin in the game had their houses’ value plunge. But no one on the left will talk about that. And guess what... “Zero Down Payment Loans,” resurfaced while Dodd-Frank was in full affect. This monster of a legislative piece was just enacted to make people feel like we were then protected. All it actually did was hinder economic growth and hurt small community banks that could not keep billions in cash assets on hand. Many of small community banks were then forced to close their door in direct opposition to what this legislation was supposed to do. It only made BOA, Well Fargo, Citibank and the rest of the “too big to fail” gang that much stronger. Thank God the GOP is tackling yet another failed Obama’s era legislation. Good riddance!

    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
  • John
    07/21/2018
    ···

    Keep and strengthen Dodd-Frank.

    Like (17)
    Follow
    Share
  • Andrew
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Dod/Frank should remain in place.

    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
  • Robert
    07/21/2018
    ···

    The good all days, back when politicians cared about the citizens of this country more than the money from their corporate donors.

    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
  • Marybeth
    07/21/2017
    ···

    This law should remain in place

    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
  • Pat
    07/21/2018
    ···

    The lack of restrictions on banks and mortgage companies caused the housing market to fail and a recession in 2008. It also cost the tax payers a lot of money because, otherwise, banks would have failed and we would have been in a depression. So, in my opinion, regulations on the banking and mortgage industries are a good thing. That is unless you want to watch it happen all over again. It happened under the Republicans last time and I expect it under the Republicans again. And, the current Administration doesn’t care since deregulation will help the economy in the short term and make them look better.

    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
  • Vanessa
    07/21/2017
    ···

    I miss your leadership so much. How could we have let that new piece of work anywhere near our hallowed halls???

    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
  • Marc
    07/21/2017
    ···

    This should be a milestone in the protection of the American people

    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
  • Kmason
    07/21/2017
    ···

    This bill in its original form did not go far enough to prevent repeating the history of 2008. Recent Republican repeals of portions of this bill were irresponsible and reckless. The too big to fail banks are now 25% larger than they were then. The derivatives market (economic Russian roulette) has grown so large it could literally swallow the GDP of the entire world 10 times $1.2 quadrillion. If this is not reigned in it is going to do irreparable damage to the World economy.

    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
  • Linda
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Happy Birthday to Dodd-Frank. The public needs protections from banking procedures and policies that cause harm. Regulations accomplish that. If the regulations need updating for current conditions then that could be debated. But turning corporations loose to benefit stockholders and executives is wrong. They will not self-police. We've seen that policy destroy lives. Save Dodd-Frank and the CFPB.

    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
  • Lawrence
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Great Bill, needs strengthening.

    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
  • Raymond
    07/21/2017
    ···

    We all need to remember that in November 2018 that new faces wins races!! Vote the old faces out and the new face in!!

    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
  • BeStrong
    07/21/2017
    ···

    Remember 2008 > when a President put the financial institutions on notice. What a difference a Presidency makes 😳

    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
  • Chickie
    07/21/2018
    ···

    The safety net provided by Dodd-Frank is being cut, tether by tether by this administration. Their focus has been and always will be on that top 1%. Anyone who believes that not to be the case, just look at how much #45 has increased his own bottom lines in his business ventures, that of his own family and of course Russia pay backs! For proof, we would need to see #45’s income tax returns....oh, that’s right, he seems to think there’s no need for anyone to see them! #voteinthemidtermelections

    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share