Should goods and services be provided voluntarily, rather than through coercion? Yes, of course. I cannot imagine how someone could claim to have an ethical defense for saying No to this. "I'm fully human with rights and liberties and self-ownership, and so are you - until you use those in a way I think you shouldn't. Then you're a mere object that I get to overrule and impose my will on. Because I'm ethical." You're not ethical, and nothing you accomplish by these means can ever be truly just.