The President of the United States, no matter who he or she is, should not be profiting by the government selecting to use the services of his/her businesses over others. There should at least be voting on this after cost analysis provided to whoever votes. If the POTUS has a business that provides more cost-efficient services or goods, it may be considered and voted on as an option for government use. If it costs less, it should only be used if the business has financial records and current tax returns made available to the public as well as the government. Profiteering is wrong for the POTUS, and I thought it was illegal. I don’t understand why this obvious abuse of the office has not been acted on yet. If Hillary Clinton had done this or similar as POTUS, she would probably be in prison by now-as perhaps would be fitting. If this is not corruption and waste of taxpayer money, what is?