When HR622 comes up I expect you will see the wisdom of saying "NO". Loss of the limited amount of law enforcement on BLM and USFS administered public lands means that public resources would be trampled and destroyed, infrastructure would be damaged or destroyed, more drug sites would spring up and casual users of these lands would likely be intimidated by Bundy types. Not to mention the inevitable escalation of threats to federal employees charged with managing theses lands and resources based on laws and direction SET BY CONGRESS. HR622 is wrong, ill advised and dangerous to the land and people who value it. Say NO to HR622.