Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

senate Bill S. 595

Should Certain Cops and Military Personnel Not Need to Pass a Polygraph to Work for Customs and Border Protection?

Argument in favor

The law enforcement officers and members of the military who this bill waives CBP’s polygraph requirement for applicants who’ve already taken one or been thoroughly vetted in their current jobs through a background check, so an additional polygraph test is unnecessary.

Anthony's Opinion
···
08/29/2017
Use of the polygraph should be entirely discountinued. It has no basis in any sort of scientific reality and is a pointless waste of time for everyone involved. This is a good first step towards getting rid of an absurd, entirky unscientific, waste of resources.
Like (101)
Follow
Share
Carl's Opinion
···
08/29/2017
All of them should be exempt. Polygraphs aren't effective.
Like (38)
Follow
Share
Sean's Opinion
···
08/29/2017
Polygraph tests are unreliable. The guy who invented it even says they can't read a person in many cases.
Like (33)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

Customs and Border Protection has a polygraph requirement in place for a reason — to ensure that only qualified people are hired. There shouldn’t be an option to waive that requirement for law enforcement or military personnel with qualifying experience.

···
08/29/2017
Supporters of the bill argue it’s a matter of common sense: Why put people through a polygraph test if they were already approved for another law enforcement agency or the military? But CBP has struggled for years with corruption, abuse and misconduct in its ranks, including by Veterans and former Police Officers. While it may sound reasonable to say you could waive requirements from former military personnel because they have passed a polygraph, Border Patrol agents work in a different environment that is not as controlled as the military.
Like (132)
Follow
Share
Patty's Opinion
···
08/29/2017
A polygraph, fingerprints and background check should be done. Things change, a "bad apple" shouldn't be able to just switch jobs. I work with kids and get re-fingerprinted and rechecked regularly.
Like (105)
Follow
Share
Kodiwodi's Opinion
···
08/29/2017
No. Everyone takes it. Everyone passes. No exceptions.
Like (81)
Follow
Share
    Use of the polygraph should be entirely discountinued. It has no basis in any sort of scientific reality and is a pointless waste of time for everyone involved. This is a good first step towards getting rid of an absurd, entirky unscientific, waste of resources.
    Like (101)
    Follow
    Share
    Supporters of the bill argue it’s a matter of common sense: Why put people through a polygraph test if they were already approved for another law enforcement agency or the military? But CBP has struggled for years with corruption, abuse and misconduct in its ranks, including by Veterans and former Police Officers. While it may sound reasonable to say you could waive requirements from former military personnel because they have passed a polygraph, Border Patrol agents work in a different environment that is not as controlled as the military.
    Like (132)
    Follow
    Share
    A polygraph, fingerprints and background check should be done. Things change, a "bad apple" shouldn't be able to just switch jobs. I work with kids and get re-fingerprinted and rechecked regularly.
    Like (105)
    Follow
    Share
    No. Everyone takes it. Everyone passes. No exceptions.
    Like (81)
    Follow
    Share
    There are certain jobs that require the utmost screening. Armed law enforcement personnel fall into that category.
    Like (43)
    Follow
    Share
    All of them should be exempt. Polygraphs aren't effective.
    Like (38)
    Follow
    Share
    Polygraph tests are unreliable. The guy who invented it even says they can't read a person in many cases.
    Like (33)
    Follow
    Share
    CBP has struggled for years with corruption, abuse and misconduct in its ranks, including by Veterans and former Police Officers. We need to keep this check in place to ensure the CBP maintains strong standards.
    Like (29)
    Follow
    Share
    Excessive much?!?! There's 800,000+ children who need the Dream Act or DACA defended why don't you talk about important things
    Like (22)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone needs a Polygraph. We have enough problems with crooked border patrol officers not taking their oath seriously. And this polygraph should be administered annually. Mexican drug cartel have mucho dinero to entice unethical officers looking to pad their income.
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    These tests are fairly useless.
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    No special treatment should be given. People change for better and for worse.
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    What kind of flakey nonsense is this?! Oops should have realized the sponsor is RINO Flake anti-American anti-Trump. This nut has no clue about what our police forces or military is about!
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Polygraphs aren't a reliable way to tell if someone is telling the truth. I think we need to update the way we see if someone is telling the truth or not anyways
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    As we learned with Flynn Evevts may occur subsequent to the last polygraph I.e. Cops may been in a drug deal after they pass a hiring pplygray
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone needs to be vetted, no exceptions.
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a position that requires good character and integrity. A lie detector should be mandatoryx
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Polygraphs are unreliable and cannot be used as evidence in court any longer for that very reason. They should certainly not be used in any process of selecting security staff! Security checks and properly conducted interviews should form this basis for hiring, along with a 6-month probation period during which a security employee can be terminated if they are not performing to standards.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    We need more accountability in law enforcement, not less.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone should be required to pass the same hurdle as anyone else. The assumption that some are safe and others may not be is exactly that, an assumption. Experience should be enough to prove that maximum. Even with the screening that we have not there will be gaps. Let's not knowingly add more.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE