Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

senate Bill S. 1503

Should the Relationship Between Defense Contractors and the Dept. of Defense be Limited?

Argument in favor

The Dept. of Defense (DOD) has been captured by defense contractors and lobbyists who use their access to DOD to push bloated contracts through. This leads to out-of-control defense spending. By reining in defense contractors’ influence, this bill will help make DOD more accountable for its spending of taxpayer dollars.

burrkitty's Opinion
···
11/03/2019
Anything to cut down our sickeningly bloated military budget is fine. CUT IT IN HALF!!! 2% GDP or 10% of the federal budget for defense IS more than enough!
Like (67)
Follow
Share
jimK's Opinion
···
11/04/2019
All federal workers are barred from accepting employment from a contractor over whom they had recent influence, I think for 5 years. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be enforced for higher level federal executives. Further, it does not seem to much of a factor for senior military either. Contractors who can benefit by the relations of retired officers with the military officers driving future procurements are an invaluable resource to contractors who can use that influence to become favored suppliers or to influence procurement plans. Senior contractor executives are often appointed to federal government leadership positions and work toward the common benefit of the military and their ‘former’ company. And, the circle is complete! It is wrong and needs to be cleaned up. It contributes to runaway budgets for military procurements. It contributes to decisions being made based on mutually beneficial considerations instead of bottom-line costs and need. It is the evils long warned about with a growing military industrial complex. ... ... Next, if we can only keep Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firm executives out of our Treasury, Commerce Department and the FED. That’s a whole other round of ‘invested’ self-serving interests.
Like (59)
Follow
Share
Robert's Opinion
···
11/03/2019
I don’t believe there should be any lobbyist in any industry it breeds corruption.
Like (48)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

This bill goes too far and applies arbitrary limits to DOD’s engagement with defense contractors. By making defense contracts subject to FOIA requests, it would also make it difficult for DOD to ink contracts with defense companies, which are unlikely to want their trade secrets and sensitive business information to be publicly available.

Caren's Opinion
···
11/04/2019
No, that’s our military. That is the defense of our country, the protectors of our borders, the ones who are sometimes called upon to enforce our laws. How can we in good conscience not adequately support and properly fund our military. It is no surprise that Elizabeth Warren would suggest this as she is searching a way to fund her Medicare for All plan which we know will financially devastate the middle class because 1% of the population (rich people and businesses) cannot afford to fund this indefinitely. Her plan is a pie in the sky all your physical needs will be met and you will be prosperous, but it is a plan that she will not be able to deliver on no more than Obamacare was a success. Many not on Obamacare saw their insurance premiums go up and benefits became subpar. Warren’s plan will kill us financially. Government will be unable to sustain this and claims for treatment will be denied for those who need the most care. It’s possible there might be an option like Canada has where if the government denies to cover treatment you can get care independently, no insurance, but you pay directly out of your pocket. No, we can’t afford not to keep our government funded and we can’t afford anything that Elizabeth Warren suggests, recommends, or plans to dish out.
Like (2)
Follow
Share
Curt's Opinion
···
11/04/2019
WARREN IS A DELUSIONAL LIAR. THEREFORE I NEVER SUPPORT A WARREN BILL!
Like (2)
Follow
Share
John 's Opinion
···
11/04/2019
The DoD is one of the only valid organizations in the long as they aren’t operational inside the USA, it’s all good.
Like (1)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The house has not voted
  • The senate has not voted
      senate Committees
      Committee on Armed Services
    IntroducedMay 16th, 2019

What is Senate Bill S. 1503?

This bill — the Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-corruption Act of 2019 — would seek to limit contractors’ influence on the military, constrain foreign influence on retired senior military officers, and assert greater transparency over contractors and their interactions with the Dept. of Defense (DOD). The three specific elements of this bill are outlined below. 


CLOSE THE REVOLVING DOOR & RESTRICT CONTRACTOR INFLUENCE

This section of the bill would: 

  • Limit the revolving door between senior DOD officials and industry by imposing a four-year ban on giant contractors hiring senior DOD officials and on contractors hiring former DOD employees who managed their contract; 
  • Extend the existing prohibition on former military generals lobbying the DOD to four years;
  • Require defense contractors to submit detailed annual reports to DOD regarding former senior DOD officials who they subsequently employ; 
  • Raise the recusal standard for DOD employees by prohibiting them from participating in any matter that affects the financial interests of their former employer for four years; and
  • Ban senior DOD officials from owning any stock in a major defense contractor (defined as having over $1 billion of revenue from DOD in a single year) and ban all DOD employees from owning any stock in contractors if they can use their official positions to influence the stock’s value.


LIMIT FOREIGN INFLUENCE

This section of the bill would: 

  • Require military service secretaries to submit annual reports to Congress containing the emoluments waivers issued to retired senior military officers to be hired by or receive compensation from foreign governments;
  • Require the Secretary of State’s explicit approval, in consideration of U.S. national security interests, for all former senior officials of the White House and Depts. of State, Defense, and Treasury who seek paid work for a foreign government or non-governmental foreign entity; and
  • Ban all former military and civilian intelligence officers from working for any foreign government or private entity that operates predominantly on behalf of a foreign government.


ENSURE CONTACTOR TRANSPARENCY

This section of the bill would: 

  • Require large defense contractors to submit a report of their lobbying activities, including who they’re meeting with, what they’re lobbying about, and what (unclassified) information they’re sharing;
  • Require the Secretary of Defense to publish online copies of all DOD contracts worth more than $10 million, including any relevant and available performance history of the contractor;
  • Make private defense contractors subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the federal open records law; and
  • Require the military services to maintain public websites with the names, biographies, and any associated financial disclosures, as well as DOD Inspector General reports and command climate surveys, regarding all active and reserve component senior military officers.

Impact

Defense contractors; defense lobbyists; current and former DOD employees; current and former military officers; DOD; FOIA; and the DOD Inspector General.

Cost of Senate Bill S. 1503

A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.

More Information

In-DepthSen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) introduced this bill to limit contractors’ influence over the military, constrain foreign influence on retired senior military officers and assert greater transparency over contractors’ interactions with the Dept. of Defense (DOD)

“We need to fundamentally change the way Washington does business and put power back in the hands of the American people – that includes making sure national security decisions are driven only by what best keeps Americans safe, and not by defense industry profit-making. That’s why I have introduced the most sweeping anti-corruption legislation since Watergate, and why today I am introducing a bill to crack down on corporate influence at the Pentagon.”

In a Medium post, Sen. Warren added

“There are talented and patriotic Americans who work in the defense industry. And there’s no question that public and private collaboration has helped produce real advances in new technology. But today, the coziness between defense lobbyists, Congress, and the Pentagon ― what former President Dwight D. Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex ― tilts countless decisions, big and small, away from legitimate national security interests, and toward the desires of giant corporations that thrive off taxpayer dollars… In 2017, Lockheed alone received more than $35 billion in taxpayer dollars from defense contracts. That’s more than the federal government spent on the entire budget for NASA. Many of these private companies are under pressure to show year over year revenue to their shareholders and investors on Wall Street. That means they are constantly pressuring the federal government for more spending ― regardless of our national security needs. It’s long past time for real reform.”

Sen. Warren argued that defense contractors’ mass hiring of former Pentagon officials and congressional staffers amounts to a lobbying army

“These giant contractors have deployed an extremely profitable strategy: recruit armies of lobbyists from former Pentagon officials and congressional staffers who stream through the revolving door. Then, get those former officials to use their relationships and access to influence our country’s national security apparatus. We have to call this what it is: corruption, plain and simple.”

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), who intends to introduce similar legislation in the House, says

“We need to stop making it easy for predatory contractors to make a fast buck off American taxpayers by price-gouging the Pentagon with bloated contracts. Our laws and rules are too lax and give contractors too much power and access. Industry should be a tool of national defense, not the other way around. This bill goes a long way toward fixing that imbalance.”

James Hasik, a senior research fellow at the Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University, argues that this legislation is poorly crafted and would harm national security interests. His sharpest criticism focuses on the application of public records laws to private defense contractors’ contracts with the federal government: 

“Who would so hazard his intellectual property, his business strategies, and sundry other reasonable secrets to any willy-nilly Freedom of Information Act request that a gadfly might lodge? This particular provision, if enforced to the letter, would be absolutely disastrous for the market entry and innovation that the Pentagon wants to encourage.”

This legislation doesn’t have any cosponsors.


Of NoteThis bill is consistent with Sen. Warren’s vision of a 21st century defense policy that includes “ending the stranglehold of defense contractors” that occurs when “the Pentagon is captured by the so-called ‘Big Five’ defense contractors—and taxpayers are picking up the bill.” It also dovetails with her Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act, which is the most ambitious anti-corruption legislation since Watergate. 

President Dwight D. Eisenhower called the tight relationship between defense contractors and the Pentagon the “military-industrial complex.” Sen. Warren’s office contends that the military-industrial complex “nudges countless decisions away from legitimate national security interests, and toward the interests of giant defense corporations and contractors that make a profit from taxpayer dollars.”

Defense contractors often recruit former DOD officials through the revolving door to become lobbyists. These former officials then use their relationships and access to peddle influence at the Pentagon and secure lucrative defense contracts for their employers. 

The Project on Government Oversight’s (POGO) Center for Defense Information reports that nearly 400 high-ranking DOD officials and military officers went through the revolving door in 2018. They became lobbyists, board members, executives, or consultants for defense contractors — and one in four, including top U.S. military brass, went to work for one of the DOD’s top five contractors. POGO reported that the top 20 defense contractors — including Boeing and Lockheed Martin — hired over 600 former senior government officials, top military officers, Congressional leaders and senior legislative staff in 2018 alone.

Sen. Warren is among several progressive 2020 Democratic candidates who’ve called for a reevaluation of the United States’ military and defense agenda. When Congress passed one of the biggest defense budgets in modern U.S. history with overwhelming bipartisan support in 2019, Sen. Warren was one of ten senators — along with fellow 2020 candidates Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Kamala Harris (D-CA) — who voted against it

Sen. Warren herself has also been seen as a champion for defense contractors in her home state of Massachusetts, where General Dynamics and Raytheon are major employers with billion-dollar government defense contracts. In 2015, Raytheon told Politico it had a “positive relationship” with Sen. Warren and interacted with her staff regularly. Sen. Warren was also reported to have been instrumental in fighting proposed cuts to a General Dynamics contract — which Massachusetts lobbyists said ingratiated her with the defense industry. 

The Free Beacon reports that Sen. Warren accepted $82,444 in donations from defense industry lobbyists from 2011-2018 and spoke with Raytheon CEO William Swanson during the 2012 Senate campaign. It also argued that she has acted in favor of defense industry interests while in the Senate. 


Media:

Summary by Lorelei Yang

(Photo Credit: iStockphoto.com / Lanier)

AKA

Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-corruption Act of 2019

Official Title

A bill to promote ethics and prevent corruption in Department of Defense contracting and other activities, and for other purposes.

    Anything to cut down our sickeningly bloated military budget is fine. CUT IT IN HALF!!! 2% GDP or 10% of the federal budget for defense IS more than enough!
    Like (67)
    Follow
    Share
    All federal workers are barred from accepting employment from a contractor over whom they had recent influence, I think for 5 years. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be enforced for higher level federal executives. Further, it does not seem to much of a factor for senior military either. Contractors who can benefit by the relations of retired officers with the military officers driving future procurements are an invaluable resource to contractors who can use that influence to become favored suppliers or to influence procurement plans. Senior contractor executives are often appointed to federal government leadership positions and work toward the common benefit of the military and their ‘former’ company. And, the circle is complete! It is wrong and needs to be cleaned up. It contributes to runaway budgets for military procurements. It contributes to decisions being made based on mutually beneficial considerations instead of bottom-line costs and need. It is the evils long warned about with a growing military industrial complex. ... ... Next, if we can only keep Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firm executives out of our Treasury, Commerce Department and the FED. That’s a whole other round of ‘invested’ self-serving interests.
    Like (59)
    Follow
    Share
    I don’t believe there should be any lobbyist in any industry it breeds corruption.
    Like (48)
    Follow
    Share
    While you are at it, stop the insider trading that take place. You folks are in office to serve the people not your personal wealth.
    Like (31)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes. Yes. A thousand times yes! This will prevent the awarding of defense contracts to certain companies who have friends in the Congress or Senate!
    Like (25)
    Follow
    Share
    We shouldn’t be promoting a cozy relationship between defense contractors and the department of defense
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    Close the lobbying loopholes; we should NOT have lobbyists in Washington.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    The defense spending is out of control, and these people just give the money to the same few people, creating a circle of unimaginable power and wealth. Meanwhile, soldiers and citizens alike get the breadcrumbs. FUCK THAT. I would like to see us spend the entire budget on citizens and force the military to coast for just ONE year. We could: -pay down the deficit -give the non wealthy 100% of their tax money back -begin a health insurance solution -assist with education-related debt -cheaply build temporary housing for ALL of the nation’s homeless -help farmers -attack and make a dent in trade issues -do something about the crazy ass Russians in our country that think they are American Republicans.
    Like (11)
    Follow
    Share
    We don't need things to be easy, we need things to be right. I often sound like a broken record, saying smaller federal government, give more power to the states and less power to the president... Well, this is federal, and important... and we desperately need to trim the fat on all corners of the federal government...
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    Cut military spending by half - stop these people from profiting over endless war impoverishing working Americans who pay the bill!
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, having clear, specific guidelines for when current and former DoD officials can lobby or work for defense contractors would be a good start to greater transparency.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    And limit the influences.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Dick Cheney is a war profiteer, G. W. is an idiot, and we are all culpable in an illegal war that resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, and they should be completely and utterly transparent.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes!!! Definitely..no question about it!!
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Eisenhower warned of the military-industrial complex as he left office as President. Hs advice was not heeded and we have an incestuous relationship between the two as a result. For best results there should be NO relationship between contractors, lobbyists, and the government. Ethics and government too often are mutually exclusive concepts, and our current administration is a neon sign to that.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    The Dept. of Defense (DOD) has been captured by defense contractors and lobbyists who use their access to DOD to push bloated contracts through. This leads to out-of-control defense spending. By reining in defense contractors’ influence, this bill will help make DOD more accountable for its spending of taxpayer dollars.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    There should be no conflict of interest
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    YES. routing out corruption in government should be paramount.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE