Using International Fishing Agreements to Stop Illegal Fishing (H.R. 774)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 774?
(Updated August 2, 2018)
This bill was enacted on November 5, 2015
This bill would implement laws from eight existing international fishery agreements aimed at combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing operations.
It would impose the sanctions of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and apply civil penalties, criminal offenses, and civil forfeitures against persons violating new enforcement provisions. $450,000 in appropriations would be authorized in each fiscal year between 2016 and 2020 to implement enforcement provisions of this bill.
The newly implemented agreements include:
This bill implements the Port State Measures Agreement that seeks to prevent illegally caught fish from entering the world ports and global seafood market. Vessels would be required to provide information specified in the Port State Measures Agreement to the Secretary of Commerce prior to entering port.
Based on the information supplied, the Secretary could allow or deny port entry, and can deny entry if it is listed as an IUU vessel, if there is reasonable suspicion that it has engaged in IUU activities in violation of this act. Notice of the denial would be sent to the vessel’s flag nation, international organizations, and relevant coastal nations. If a suspected IUU vessel has already entered port, it would be denied the ability to use the port for processing and packing of fish, refueling, resupplying, maintenance or repairs.
The Department of Commerce and the Coast Guard would be required to conduct vessel inspections, and authorized officers could make arrests; board, search, or inspect vessels; seize gear; execute and serve subpoenas; and perform other activities if there is probable cause that violations of this act have occurred.
Argument in favor
Illegal fishing jeopardizes the sustainable future of our planet’s fisheries by depleting local fish stocks and destroying sensitive marine habitat. Also, it hurts the U.S. fishing industry economically, which damages coastal communities.
Argument opposed
Even if the U.S. decides to fully implement this legislation and enforce these international agreements, there’s no guarantee other nations or individual vessels will cooperate.
Impact
The U.S. fisheries industry, fishing vessels conducting IUU activities, the Coast Guard, the Department of Commerce, the Secretary of Commerce.
Cost of H.R. 774
The CBO estimates that implementing this bill would cost $2 million over the 2016-2020 period. Further, it projects that increases in spending and penalties would cost less than $500,000 per year and would offset each other in most years.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo (D-GU) said that her bill:
“Provides much-needed enforcement tools to the Coast Guard and NOAA to combat IUU fishing, and it implements a treaty ratified by the Senate last year to deny vessels port entry and services if they engage in IUU fishing.”
This bill was passed unanimously by the House Committee on Natural Resources. Identical legislation was also passed by the Committee on December 22, 2014, but it did not receive a vote before the end of the 113th Congress.
The Secretary of Commerce would be directed to participate in and provide assistance to international efforts addressing IUU fishing activities, bycatch concerns, fisheries monitoring, and other efforts to achieve sustainable fisheries. Additional enforcement authority related to illegally harvested or imported fish products would be provided by this legislation -- in addition to provisions for information sharing with international fishing agreement partners.
The Secretary would be required to notify the President and any nation whose vessel has been identified engaging in IUU fishing activities or practices within the past three years, and would be authorized to take actions against nations that fail to address or regulate the illegal activity.
Of Note: According to NOAA, illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing results in global economic losses between $10 billion and $23 billion each year, and produces between 11 and 26 million tons of illegal seafood -- representing as much as 40 percent of the total catch in some fisheries.
Media:
- Sponsoring Del. Madeleine Bordallo (D-GU) Press Release
- House Committee on Natural Resources Markup Summary
- CBO Cost Estimate
- Oceana (In Favor)
- FishWise (In Favor)
- Ocean Champions (Previous Version - In Favor)
-
NOAA (Context)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Flickr user Coast Guard News)
The Latest
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...
-
How To Help Civilians in UkraineHeavy shelling and fighting have caused widespread death, destruction of homes and businesses, and severely damaged read more... Public Safety