Do the Feds Need to Improve Their Technology for Detecting Nuclear Weapons? (H.R. 690)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 690?
(Updated October 21, 2019)
This bill would require the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) to focus its research and development on creating and improving technologies to detect and prevent the entry, transport, assembly, or potential use of a nuclear weapon or other fissile or radiological material in the U.S.
The DNDO’s research and development activities would:
Develop and maintain reports that give information on how the Office’s research investments align with gaps in the enhanced global nuclear detection architecture and with research challenges the Office has identified and seeks to address;
Explain the rationale for prioritizing and selecting research topics;
Develop a systematic approach for evaluating how the outcomes of the Office’s individual research projects collectively contribute to addressing research challenges.
Argument in favor
Nuclear weapons and other bombs with fissile or radiological material pose a significant threat to national security, and federal research into detecting such devices should focus on closing the gaps in the system.
Argument opposed
The Dept. of Homeland Security is already trying to research ways to improve the system for detecting nuclear devices. Plus this bill only calls for research to focus on gaps in the system without providing funding.
Impact
Public safety; the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office; and the Dept. of Homeland Security.
Cost of H.R. 690
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill wouldn’t significantly impact spending as DHS is already carrying out similar activities.
Additional Info
In-Depth: In the House Homeland Security Committee’s report, lawmakers explained that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the DNDO’s reports make it unclear what process it uses for planning and selecting research and development projects. The GAO noted that while the DNDO does set high-level goals and identify relevant research challenges, it doesn’t demonstrate that the projects it funds address those challenges.
This legislation was passed by the committee on a voice vote during the 114th Congress.
Media:
- Republican Policy Committee Press Release (Previous Version)
- House Homeland Security Committee Report (Previous Version)
- CBO Cost Estimate (Previous Version)
(Photo Credit: National Nuclear Security Administration / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
🌎 Are You Ready To Take Action Against Climate Change?Scientists claim that last year "smashed" the record for the hottest year by a large margin , offering a "dramatic testimony" of read more... Environment
-
Should U.S. Implement a New Tax on AI to Fund Worker Benefits?The debate As technology advances, artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into our society. While leaders in AI read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
SCOTUS Hears Arguments of Abortion Pill Mifepristone CaseUpdated March 27, 2024, 12:30 p.m. EST On Tuesday, March 26, the Supreme Court heard arguments about the mifepristone case, read more... Women's Health
-
IT: ⛑️ It's American Red Cross Giving Day, and... How will you give back today?Welcome to Wednesday, March 27th, philanthropists and entrepreneurs... It's American Red Cross Giving Day - a time to ensure the read more...