Like Countable?

Install the App

house Bill H.R. 662

Banning U.S. Funding for UN Climate Change Panels

Argument in favor

The science of climate change is still in flux, and U.S. tax dollars shouldn’t be used to fund organizations that exaggerate the extent and cause of climate change. Significantly reducing carbon emissions would also be economically painful.

Loraki's Opinion
Stop the funding of the globalist Marxist wealth redistribution scheme!
Like (10)
End the insanity now! No more funding for vile Marxist poppycock that hurts our economy.
Like (7)
Janene's Opinion
I agree with Loraki; Stop the funding of the globalist Marxist wealth redistribution scheme!
Like (4)

Argument opposed

Climate change poses an imminent threat to humanity, and combating man-made greenhouse gas emissions requires as much funding as possible. Economic pain is worth it if we can save the planet.

Faith's Opinion
The science is overwhelmingly validated. Period.
Like (4)
Frank's Opinion
The UN deal is a huge step in the right direction to getting the world on the right track to reduce pollution and climate change, please don't undo all we've achieved.
Like (2)
Hannah's Opinion
I don't understand why people don't believe in science or data.
Like (1)

bill Progress

  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house has not voted
      house Committees
      Committee on Foreign Affairs
    IntroducedFebruary 13th, 2013

What is House Bill H.R. 662?

H.R. 662 would prohibit federal departments & agencies from making any contributions — mandatory or voluntary — monetary contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).


The IPCC & UNFCCC, U.S. government appropriations committees.

Cost of House Bill H.R. 662

A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.

More Information

In Depth:

The IPCC is a UN panel established by member nations to produce reports that support the UNFCCC, which is an environmental treaty that has been signed by all UN member nations. The IPCC has produced five major reports addressing climate change and its impacts since 1990. Some of its primary claims are that:

  • Humans are a significant cause of climate change.

  • The effects of climate change could soon become irreversible & catastrophic.

  • Immediate mitigation is required throughout the world to stop greenhouse gas emissions.

The organization has at times been embroiled in controversy due to errors that have been seemingly made to stoke fear or exaggerate the threat of global warming. In its most recent report, the IPCC noted that there has been a pause in global warming since 1997, without much certainty as to its cause.

Even the amount of funding the IPCC and UNFCCC have received from the U.S. is under dispute. Sponsoring Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) claimed they have received an average of more than $10 million a year during the Obama administration, while Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) claimed it was only $2.3 million in 2013.

Another aspect of the highly charged politics of global warming is the impact that developing economies such as China and India have on carbon emissions. These countries are unwilling to impede the growth of their economies by adopting policies to reduce emissions, and they want the U.S. & Europe to lead the way.

There is a lack of political willpower in the U.S. to do so.

Polling data compiled by Third Way has shown that the economy has been the leading issue in U.S. politics since 2004, while climate change ranked at or near the bottom of Americans’ priorities in each year data was gathered. The National Association of Manufacturers estimated that implementing a carbon tax (a popular tool for reducing emissions) would decrease U.S. employment by over 2 million people in 2023. This highlights how economically problematic reducing carbon emissions can be.

In advance of the UN Climate Summit, hundreds of thousands of protesters marched in New York City at the People’s Climate March.This sparked many other rallies in solidarity across the globe. However, as usual when it comes to this issue, criticism was quick to follow after some marchers left their trash in the streets.


Sponsoring Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) Press Release

The Guardian

Fox News

Climate Science Watch (in opposition)  

Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change - IPCC Critique

(Photo Credit: Wikipedia)

Official Title

To prohibit United States contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.