Do Cities That Have to Store Nuclear Waste Need Compensation From the Feds? (H.R. 5632)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 5632?
(Updated November 15, 2017)
This bill would compensate communities where spent fuel from decommissioned nuclear power plants is stored through a program to be created by the Dept. of Energy (DOE). In total, $100 million in funding would be authorized for compensating communities that have to store the nuclear waste through fiscal year 2023.
The DOE would make one payment per fiscal year to a community storing nuclear waste, and the communities would have to apply each year to receive a payment. Local governments would receive $15 per kilogram of nuclear waste that’s stored a decommissioned power plant within their jurisdiction. If so many eligible communities apply that there’s not enough funding to go around, the DOE would have to reduce payments to all successful applicants equally to ensure that they’re all compensated to lesser extent.
Under current law, the federal government is required to operate a facility to permanently store nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, NV but it hasn’t opened because of political opposition so communities with decommissioned nuclear power plants have to store the waste.
Argument in favor
Communities that are home to decommissioned nuclear power plants deserve federal compensation for storing the nuclear waste because the federal government hasn’t opened a long-term storage facility for the waste.
Argument opposed
Just because the federal government hasn’t opened a nuclear waste storage facility like it was supposed to doesn’t mean that it should have to compensate the communities that are left storing the nuclear waste.
Impact
Communities that have to store nuclear waste from decommissioned power plants; and the DOE.
Cost of H.R. 5632
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Bob Dold (R-IL) introduced this bill to ensure that a city in his district — Zion, Illinois — and others like it don’t have to bear the burden of storing nuclear waste without federal assistance:
“Because of the government’s failure to move ahead with a long-term storage facility for nuclear waste, Zion is being forced to store the waste on the shore of Lake Michigan, severely damaging the local economy and risking environmental disaster. Our bipartisan bill will help revitalize Zion’s economy by compensating the community for storing nuclear waste until a more permanent solution is finally implemented.”
This legislation has the bipartisan support of three cosponsors in the House, including two Democrats and a Republican.
Of Note: There are 11 nuclear power plants that have been decommissioned in the U.S., though it is not clear how many of those facilities and their surrounding communities are forced to store leftover nuclear waste.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell(Photo Credit: U.S. Federal Government - Nevada Test Site)
The Latest
-
Biden Signs Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan Aid, and TikTok BillWhat’s the story? President Joe Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, which could lead to a ban read more... Taiwan
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated Apr. 23, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST Protests are growing on college campuses across the country, inspired by the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Here's how you can help fight for justice in the U.S., and... 📱 Are you concerned about your tech listening to you?Welcome to Thursday, April 18th, communities... Despite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S. read more...
-
Restore Freedom and Fight for Justice With GravvyDespite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S., manifesting itself in a multitude of ways. read more... Criminal Justice Reform