Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 424

Streamlining Homeland Security’s Security Clearance Process

Argument in favor

Homeland Security’s current security clearance process is complex, cumbersome, and opaque. This bill would force DHS to be more thoughtful about what information should and shouldn’t be classified at the organization and how it manages its security clearance process.

SneakyPete's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
👍🏻 H.R. 424 the Amendment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 👍🏻 I’m in support of this House bill H.R. 424 which would aim to improve the process for granting security clearances to Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) employees. It’d amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require that the designation of the sensitivity level of national security positions be conducted in a consistent manner in all DHS components and offices, consistent with federal guidelines. DHS must use uniform designation tools throughout DHS and provide training to appropriate staff. Homeland Security’s current security clearance process is complex, cumbersome, and opaque. This bill would force DHS to be more thoughtful about what information should and shouldn’t be classified at the organization and how it manages its security clearance process. SneakyPete.......... 👍🏻🇺🇸👍🏻🇺🇸👍🏻. 1*29*19..........
Like (15)
Follow
Share
RjGoodman's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
Yes. It costs time, money and opportunity cost for Homeland Security to provide a clearance. An inefficient system impacts all of those. They need to develop a better process to improve all three.
Like (5)
Follow
Share
Loretta's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
It would appear that this bill provides for more care and uniformity . I’m all for that.
Like (5)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

While it’s true that Homeland Security’s security clearance process is slow-moving, it’s for a good reason. Given the nature of DHS’ work, it’s important to ensure that those who access DHS information are can be trusted to put America’s interests and national security first.

Dave's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
While it’s true that Homeland Security’s security clearance process is slow-moving, it’s for a good reason. Security in general needs to be investigated and requires time and getting correct accurate information, but it doesn’t do any good if it is over ruled, like in Jared Kushner’s top security and special access plus 30 others, which they were first denied
Like (20)
Follow
Share
Tinee's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
If it's easy to obtain security clearance, then what is the point?
Like (18)
Follow
Share
Lionman's Opinion
···
01/29/2019
We have vetting processes for immigrants from overseas that last as much as 2 year. Why should our internal processes be less comprehensive?
Like (14)
Follow
Share
    👍🏻 H.R. 424 the Amendment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 👍🏻 I’m in support of this House bill H.R. 424 which would aim to improve the process for granting security clearances to Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) employees. It’d amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require that the designation of the sensitivity level of national security positions be conducted in a consistent manner in all DHS components and offices, consistent with federal guidelines. DHS must use uniform designation tools throughout DHS and provide training to appropriate staff. Homeland Security’s current security clearance process is complex, cumbersome, and opaque. This bill would force DHS to be more thoughtful about what information should and shouldn’t be classified at the organization and how it manages its security clearance process. SneakyPete.......... 👍🏻🇺🇸👍🏻🇺🇸👍🏻. 1*29*19..........
    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
    While it’s true that Homeland Security’s security clearance process is slow-moving, it’s for a good reason. Security in general needs to be investigated and requires time and getting correct accurate information, but it doesn’t do any good if it is over ruled, like in Jared Kushner’s top security and special access plus 30 others, which they were first denied
    Like (20)
    Follow
    Share
    I cannot support or oppose a bill for which I have insufficient information.
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    If it's easy to obtain security clearance, then what is the point?
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    We have vetting processes for immigrants from overseas that last as much as 2 year. Why should our internal processes be less comprehensive?
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a bullshit bill sponsored by a subversive Democrat designed to tie the hands of Homeland Security. It’s crap like this that brought us 911. Never again! VOTE No!
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    With the most corrupt president ever and White House teaming with inept corrupt appointees—no—anything but. Stumps has ignored real experts to give top secret security clearances to his know-nothing son-in-law, equally corrupt daughter, and his corrupt appointees. We are deteriorating into a banana republic dictatorship with propaganda overwhelming real facts.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    While a balance and efficiency is extremely good—in-depth vetting and evaluations and appropriate protocols are extremely good. It is just important to be thorough. Indeed, I prefer a process to run and move smoothly and efficiently but I don’t mind exhibiting patience for the sake of safety. I would do this for my children and it is equally important for our country.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes. It costs time, money and opportunity cost for Homeland Security to provide a clearance. An inefficient system impacts all of those. They need to develop a better process to improve all three.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    IF IT'S NOT BROKE, DON'T FIX IT
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    It would appear that this bill provides for more care and uniformity . I’m all for that.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Well said, singinghawk926. Just think how many secrets our own President and his ding dong son-in-law, Jared, have shared with Russia and Saudi Arabia. Scares the hell out of me!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Start with dealing with the VISA overstays. Not ready to trust ANY elected official in “streamlining” ANY process after the whole add one and remove two philosophy was passed last fall. PS Any elected official who cannot pass the same security clearance as a non elected should NOT be eligible for office. This includes any and all who are appointed by the president.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Security Clearances should be hard to obtain. Otherwise, why bother?
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    I support this but I must wonder why Homeland Security Clearances are any different from military or other security clearances. The investigations should all be the same. The depth of security would be the only difference. But if they were all rated and investigated for the highest clearance, it would save time and money.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The security make take forever, but security clearances should be hard to obtain. We need to make sure we are keeping our nation secure, and it might include a boring cumbersome process. If that is what it take then so be it as it is keeping our nation secure.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    It should be a process with the safety of the citizens and country always first. I see that certain individuals in this administration are abusing their clearance for personal gain. Just my opinion
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Seems like a prudent move. Security must be preserved!
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    These seem like Common Sense suggestions to streamline the process. It also seems to be a way to make the system more uniform and to approve qualified individuals and to appropriately dismiss non-qualified individuals. I think this makes the system more uniform clearer and more fair and less capricious.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    There is no doubt that this is one of many issues which need to be streamlined at Homeland security.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE