Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 3658

Should Military Bases Named After Members of the Confederacy be Renamed?

Argument in favor

The disgraced names of men who fought against the U.S. to preserve slavery shouldn’t be commemorated as the name of a U.S. military base or other defense-related property. There are plenty of meritorious members of the armed forces who are more deserving of that honor.

Sela's Opinion
···
09/15/2017
Confederates were literally treasonous and did not want to be a part of this country. I fail to see why that should be honored...History needs to be taught so that it doesn't repeat itself but there is no need to emulate bad/painful history or put it on a pedestal
Like (111)
Follow
Share
Aaron's Opinion
···
09/15/2017
The confederacy was a treasonous organization against the USA and should not be commemorated!
Like (64)
Follow
Share
Brendan's Opinion
···
09/15/2017
Why do we commemorate institutions fighting for democracy and freedom by naming them after individuals who lacked understanding of the meaning of freedom?
Like (42)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

This bill is a superficial attempt to erase history and it will be surprisingly costly to rename military bases. It also ignores the fact that many of the Confederate generals military bases are named after served in the U.S. military prior to the Civil War.

···
09/15/2017
These historic names represent individuals, not causes or ideologies. It should be noted that the naming occurred in the spirit of reconciliation, not division.
Like (204)
Follow
Share
Andrea's Opinion
···
09/15/2017
Where does it end? Changing names and taking down monuments doesn't change history. The only difference between the Confederates in question and people like George Washington is Washington won. Washington was a slave owner who was a traitor to his own country, England, which was the ruling government of this land until the American Revolution.
Like (86)
Follow
Share
Tom's Opinion
···
09/15/2017
No. This is history. Erased history will be forgotten and repeated. History is not for the sensitive nor the faint of heart.
Like (52)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house has not voted
      house Committees
      Committee on Armed Services
      Readiness
    IntroducedAugust 18th, 2017
    Why name military bases after traitors?
    Like (189)
    Follow
    Share
    These historic names represent individuals, not causes or ideologies. It should be noted that the naming occurred in the spirit of reconciliation, not division.
    Like (204)
    Follow
    Share
    Confederates were literally treasonous and did not want to be a part of this country. I fail to see why that should be honored...History needs to be taught so that it doesn't repeat itself but there is no need to emulate bad/painful history or put it on a pedestal
    Like (111)
    Follow
    Share
    Where does it end? Changing names and taking down monuments doesn't change history. The only difference between the Confederates in question and people like George Washington is Washington won. Washington was a slave owner who was a traitor to his own country, England, which was the ruling government of this land until the American Revolution.
    Like (86)
    Follow
    Share
    The confederacy was a treasonous organization against the USA and should not be commemorated!
    Like (64)
    Follow
    Share
    No. This is history. Erased history will be forgotten and repeated. History is not for the sensitive nor the faint of heart.
    Like (52)
    Follow
    Share
    Why do we commemorate institutions fighting for democracy and freedom by naming them after individuals who lacked understanding of the meaning of freedom?
    Like (42)
    Follow
    Share
    They are part of America's military history!!!!
    Like (40)
    Follow
    Share
    Absolutely not! The generals that served in the War of the Southern Succession were also generals who served in some capacity in the Mexican-American War and were pardoned by President Abraham Lincoln under the terms of surrender at Appomattox Courthouse. Their names are only being tainted by a select few voices who believe they can rewrite our history and destroy those who believe in the power of state's rights, and the ability to hold the Federal Government account for their overreach.
    Like (36)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a difficult one for me. I believe that confederate monuments belong in museums, not in the public square, and I think the whole "erasing history" argument is a red herring attempting to distract from the fact that we still need to deal with the ever present argument of racism in this country, and removing a confederate monument from the very place slaves were bought and sold seems like a no-brainer to me. However, as a military person I also understand that there is a difference between removing monuments and renaming military posts. The cost of this would be way more than I personally would find acceptable, considering how often our troops go without certain things; yes I know it all falls under the military industrial complex, and may come from two different pots of money, but it seems to me that policies within the armed forces regarding race and gender equality are far more important that whether or not they are serving on Fort Benning, Fort Bragg or Fort Rucker, all posts named after confederate generals.
    Like (35)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes...Why is this even a question?
    Like (30)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone has a right to their own opinion and for it to be respected. With that said it should be said that not all southerners were Pro-Slavery. Robert E Lee who commanded the southern army was not a racist, but in fact took up the fight to defend his home. It should also be noted, Abraham Lincoln and the northern armies primary intention was to bring the south back into the union, not to free slaves. It wasn't until several years later that slavery was slowly being dissolved even in the north. When the civil war started there were still a recorded 450,000 slaves in the union. Food for thought.
    Like (30)
    Follow
    Share
    Enough is enough! This is completely ridiculous!
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    Why in the world would we have military bases named after the LOSERS? These people committed treason, and were willing to die to keep other people chains. They don't deserve to have a chicken coop named after them.
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    No they should not be renamed. There is so much happening in our world today it is nothing but idiocy to immerse ourselves in the civil war. Those generals were incredible in their military skills and should be respected for that. Period. Stop looking for more ways to divide this country we're overloaded with that as it is.
    Like (22)
    Follow
    Share
    History is what makes all of us who we are whether we agreed with what happened or not.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    The Confederacy is dead, lets leave the treason of our country behind us.
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, they lost. Why name anything for losers.....
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes!
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    This is ridiculous and has gotten out of control. It's a part of our history. Get over it
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE