Modifying Regulations for Fuel Storage on Farms (H.R. 311)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 311?
(Updated January 31, 2017)
Modifies regulations for fuel storage on farms. Farmers must follow fuel storage guidelines laid out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Until the 21st Century, regulations for fuel storage on farms applied mainly to large farming operations. In 2009, the EPA expanded the Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) to include smaller farms, including those with no history of accidents.
The rule requires that oil storage facilities with a capacity of over 1,320 gallons make structural improvements to reduce the possibility of oil spills. The plan requires farmers to construct a containment facility, like a dike or a basin, which must retain 110 percent of the fuel in the container. These mandated infrastructure improvements must come with third-party certification.
Known as The FUELS Act, the bill will modify the EPA mandate by raising exemption levels. The exemption level for a single container would be adjusted upward to 10,000 gallons while the aggregate level on a production facility would move up to 42,000 gallons. The proposal would also place a greater degree of responsibility on the farmer or rancher to self-certify compliance if it exceeds the exemption level. The bill would be limited to farms that store more than 1,320 gallons of oil products in aboveground containers or more than 42,000 of oil products in buried containers.
Argument in favor
Offsets costs of EPA-mandated regulations to farmers. A University of Arkansas study found that the FUELS Act could save farmers and ranchers across the country up to $3.36 billion.
Argument opposed
The proposal places a greater degree of responsibility on farmers and ranchers to self-certify compliance of their oil storage facilities, moving oversight away from government and toward individual farming operations.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would save some farming and ranching operations money. Self-certification could be ignored, which, in turn, could increase the possibility of safety and/or environmental concerns.
Cost of H.R. 311
The CBO estimates a cost of $2 million over the next five years.
Additional Info
Media:
The Latest
-
IT: 🖋️ Biden signs a bill approving military aid and creating hurdles TikTok, and... Should the U.S. call for a ceasefire?Welcome to Thursday, April 25th, readers near and far... Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, read more...
-
Biden Signs Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan Aid, and TikTok BillWhat’s the story? President Joe Biden signed a bill that approved aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, which could lead to a ban read more... Taiwan
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated Apr. 23, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST Protests are growing on college campuses across the country, inspired by the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Here's how you can help fight for justice in the U.S., and... 📱 Are you concerned about your tech listening to you?Welcome to Thursday, April 18th, communities... Despite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S. read more...