Should Members of Congress Not be Exempt From American Health Care Act Waivers? (H.R. 2192)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 2192?
(Updated June 25, 2020)
This bill would eliminate an exemption contained in the American Health Care Act that would’ve allowed members of Congress and their staffers to be exempted from state waivers of Obamacare requirements like the essential health benefits mandate if the AHCA were to become law.
Argument in favor
Members of Congress and their staffs should have to live under the laws that they write and enact. No exemption from waivers granted to states under the American Health Care Act should be given to them.
Argument opposed
Members of Congress and their staffs make significant sacrifices to serve their constituents. Because they spend so much time away from their home state they shouldn’t be subject to state AHCA waivers.
Impact
Members of Congress and their staffs.
Cost of H.R. 2192
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ) introduced this bill to prevent members of Congress from exempting themselves from the American Health Care Act:
“In America, lawmakers are not above the law. Members of Congress should be treated no differently than other Americans struggling to afford healthcare. Representatives should have to abide by the very same options for coverage as their constituents, and anything short of that is simply hypocrisy. Congress must live by the rules it creates.”
This legislation has the support of 80 cosponsors in the House, all of whom are Republicans.
Of Note: House Republicans were widely criticized when it was revealed that an exception had been inserted into the American Health Care Act. During the debate surrounding Obamacare, Republicans successfully moved to require members of Congress and their staffs to obtain health insurance through the exchanges available to the rest of Americans.
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Medill DC via Flickr / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
IT: 🛢️ New Vermont measure could charge Big Oil for climate damages, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Friday, May 10th, friends... Vermont could be one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages read more...
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...