Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 219

Prohibiting Federal Tax-Exempt Bonds From Being Used to Build Abortion Clinics

Argument in favor

Since the Hyde Amendment already bans the use of federal funds for abortion services, and construction bonds are essentially a federal subsidy, it follows that federal tax-exempt bonds shouldn’t be used to support abortion clinics in any way — including by funding their construction.

johnow's Opinion
···
01/20/2019
Quit spending tax payer money on pet projects.. If a Company can not get a loan from a bank to build a building, then why are they in business. Federal Government should not be involved in opening businesses or Bailing them out.. Businesses need to make it by themselves..
Like (72)
Follow
Share
JTJ's Opinion
···
02/17/2019
Hands off your uterus? Get your hands out of my pocket! Do it on your own dime.
Like (33)
Follow
Share
SneakyPete's Opinion
···
02/17/2019
👍🏻 House Bill H.R. 219 AKA the No Abortion Bonds Act 👍🏻 I’m in support of and recommend the passage of this House bill H.R. 219 AKA the No Abortion Bonds Act — would impose taxes on state, local, and tax credit bonds that are used to build a facility owned or used by an abortion provider for more than 30 days during a year in which interest is paid on the bond. Since the Hyde Amendment already bans the use of federal funds for abortion services, and construction bonds are essentially a federal subsidy, it follows that federal tax-exempt bonds shouldn’t be used to support abortion clinics in any way — including by funding their construction. An entity wouldn’t be considered an “abortion provider” if the abortions it performs are only in the cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger. ANY form of abortion, from conception to the now “Infamous Forth Trimester Abortion” should be banned except that of cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger. SneakyPete.......... 🙅🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🙅‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️. 2*17*19............
Like (26)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

In general, the abortion clinics in question aren’t abortion-only providers — they’re women’s health clinics that provide important services such as STI/STD testing, contraceptive prescriptions, and more. Cutting off their access to tax-exempt bonds would hurt women’s healthcare.

Abbi's Opinion
···
02/17/2019
The Hyde agreement stated no federal funds will go to abortions, not the building it’s self. This is stupid, many clinics offer affordable healthcare services to people in the way of screenings, STD education, pregnancy prevention, STDs and unwanted pregnancies go DOWN when education is present. I am sick of being told what to do with my body by old men too scared to meet with their constituents. To add irony to this debate they insist it’s all for protecting children yet on several occasions many of these senators and representatives have worked tirelessly to kill healthcare, environmental protections, public schools, snap, and anything else that benefits children. This is not about protecting children, this is about control.
Like (192)
Follow
Share
Mary's Opinion
···
02/17/2019
This bill is a waste of time and my tax dollars. Stay away from my uterus.
Like (108)
Follow
Share
Elisabeth's Opinion
···
02/17/2019
First of all, separation of CHURCH and STATE. Secondly, there are things I pay taxes for that I have never used. Public Schools, for one. An abortion is simply part of healthcare, as it should be. Stop playing games with our bodies, work on actual legislation that will improve the lives of children born, and get on with your lives.
Like (81)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house has not voted
      house Committees
      Committee on Ways and Means
    IntroducedJanuary 3rd, 2019

What is House Bill H.R. 219?

This bill — known as the No Abortion Bonds Act — would impose taxes on state, local, and tax credit bonds that are used to build a facility owned or used by an abortion provider for more than 30 days during a year in which interest is paid on the bond. An entity wouldn’t be considered an “abortion provider” if the abortions it performs are only in the cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger.

The Department of the Treasury could exempt certain hospitals from being considered abortion providers by making the hospital’s name available on Treasury’s public website.

Impact

Hospitals; abortion providers; state, local, and tax credit bonds; Internal Revenue Code; and the Department of the Treasury.

Cost of House Bill H.R. 219

A CBO cost estimate for this bill is unavailable.

More Information

In-Depth: Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) reintroduced this bill from the 115th Congress to prohibit federal tax-exempt bonds' use to finance the construction of abortion clinics:

“For 42 years it has been law in this country that no federal funds can be used for abortion services. Yet a loophole in the tax code remains, allowing abortion clinics to be built using federally subsidized tax-free bonds. The No Abortion Bonds Act would remedy this and take another step in the right direction to defend innocent life and protect vulnerable unborn children.”

In the previous Congress, Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC) introduced this bill to prohibit the use of federal tax-exempt bonds to finance the construction of abortion clinics:

“Under a loophole in the current law, cities, counties, and states can issue federally tax-free bonds to finance construction of abortion clinics. These tax-free bonds are intended to finance schools, hospitals, and infrastructure, not abortion clinics.  This legislation applies the spirit of the Hyde Amendment to the tax code, by preventing tax-free bonds from going to abortion providers.”

Given that Planned Parenthood — which provides abortion services in some of its clinics — has historically been a major recipient of these bonds, Pittenger argues that tax-exempt bonds convey a direct benefit to Planned Parenthood, since it acts as a less expensive loan for the group to pay back. He said these bonds therefore act as a federal subsidy to Planned Parenthood that is inconsistent with current federal law, which prohibits the use of taxpayer funds for abortion or abortion services.

Although Planned Parenthood has not made public statements on this bill, it has commented on similar attempts to revoke or otherwise reduce its funding, especially around abortion care. Dara Singiser, Vice President of Public Policy and Government Relations for the organization, said the following about H.R. 4712, a bill criminalizing abortion providers:

“Planned Parenthood physicians provide high-quality medical care and adhere to the most rigorous professional standards, including providing emergency care. The political agenda here is clear: to take away access to safe, legal abortion. Time and time again, the American people have rejected these blatantly political attacks on women’s health care. Instead of attacking women’s health, Congress needs to listen to the American people and invest in women and families.”

Missouri Right to Life supports this bill in the current Congress. Its executive director, Susan Klein, says:

“Missouri Right to Life supports the No Abortions Bond Act as it will deny ‘tax credit bond status’ to any bonds used to provide a facility owned by an abortion provider. Our federal tax dollars should not be used to support the killing of unborn children. This bill is another attempt by our pro-life legislators to reduce and eventually eliminate the hundreds of millions of dollars in government funds making its way into the pockets of abortion providers each year. Missouri Right to Life applauds Congressman Jason Smith and all of the Members of Congress who support this bill.”

Americans United for Life, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Susan B. Anthony List, National Right to Life, the Eagle Forum, March for Life, and Family Policy Alliance, are among the organizations that supported this bill in the 115th Congress. In its letter of support, Family Policy Alliance wrote of this bill:

“[This] legislation applies the principle of the Hyde Amendment consistently to government spending, including through the tax code, ensuring that families are not forced to subsidize abortion facilities. Additionally, we appreciate that [this] legislation demonstrates a dedication to good stewardship of American families’ money. Many of the facilities that have benefited from millions of dollars worth of federal tax-exempt bonds include Planned Parenthood and its affiliates, which together generate over one billion in revenue according to Planned Parenthood’s latest annual report. With our nation’s current debt level and many existing infrastructure responsibilities, providing tax-free, subsidized, low-interest loans for abortion facilities—particularly for an abortion giant like Planned Parenthood— is clearly not a priority.”

There are 42 cosponsors of this bill in the current Congress, all of whom are Republicans. In the previous Congress, there were 104 cosponsors of this bill, including 103 Republicans and one Democrat.


Of NoteState and local governments are allowed to finance the construction of schools, roads, and hospitals with special bonds exempt from federal taxes. These tax breaks for the investors in such projects, which cost the federal government billions in revenue and lead to lower costs for the borrowers, are a federal taxpayer subsidy of these projects.

While the 1976 Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of taxpayer funding for abortion or abortion-related services, the use of tax-exempt federal bonds to build abortion clinics represents a loophole that allows state and local governments to effectively use federal subsidies for abortion clinics.

Lawmakers in various states have issued millions of dollars' worth of tax-exempt bonds to finance the construction of Planned Parenthood clinics in a range of states::

  • In 2012, New York City issued a tax-free, $15 million bond for renovation of Planned Parenthood’s national headquarters

  • In 2007, the Illinois Finance Authority approved an $8.05 million tax-free bond to pay for a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Aurora

  • In 2006, the Massachusetts Development Finance Agency granted a $5 million tax-exempt bond for a Planned Parenthood clinic in Worcester


Media:

Summary by Lorelei Yang

(Photo Credit: iStock.com / jetcityimages)

AKA

No Abortion Bonds Act

Official Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose Federal taxes on bonds used to provide facilities owned by abortion providers.

    Quit spending tax payer money on pet projects.. If a Company can not get a loan from a bank to build a building, then why are they in business. Federal Government should not be involved in opening businesses or Bailing them out.. Businesses need to make it by themselves..
    Like (72)
    Follow
    Share
    The Hyde agreement stated no federal funds will go to abortions, not the building it’s self. This is stupid, many clinics offer affordable healthcare services to people in the way of screenings, STD education, pregnancy prevention, STDs and unwanted pregnancies go DOWN when education is present. I am sick of being told what to do with my body by old men too scared to meet with their constituents. To add irony to this debate they insist it’s all for protecting children yet on several occasions many of these senators and representatives have worked tirelessly to kill healthcare, environmental protections, public schools, snap, and anything else that benefits children. This is not about protecting children, this is about control.
    Like (192)
    Follow
    Share
    This bill is a waste of time and my tax dollars. Stay away from my uterus.
    Like (108)
    Follow
    Share
    First of all, separation of CHURCH and STATE. Secondly, there are things I pay taxes for that I have never used. Public Schools, for one. An abortion is simply part of healthcare, as it should be. Stop playing games with our bodies, work on actual legislation that will improve the lives of children born, and get on with your lives.
    Like (81)
    Follow
    Share
    Stay off our uteruses! Men have no right!
    Like (69)
    Follow
    Share
    Men denying women access to healthcare services they need is unconscionable.
    Like (66)
    Follow
    Share
    This attack on abortion is costing taxpayers billions of dollars. Conservatives need to pay back the United States for their waste of federal and local tax dollars. We should place a ban on paying Conservatives compensation with federal tax dollars.
    Like (53)
    Follow
    Share
    women’s health should not be politicized.
    Like (53)
    Follow
    Share
    So women have a Constitutional right to an abortion but under the Hyde amendment no federal funds may be used to pay for the constitutional right to an abortion? But this bill wants to further restrict federal funds from being used for the construction of facilities where abortions may be provided but not paid for? My head is spinning. Republicans need to leave women’s private parts alone and focus on standing up to this corrupt administration. Keep us safe from foreign interference into our democracy.
    Like (47)
    Follow
    Share
    This bill is a waste of time and money. STOP the war on women!
    Like (43)
    Follow
    Share
    Look planned parenthood helps women with all sorts off medical services. Stop telling women what they can and can’t do with their bodies. Also, educate yourself. Planned parenthood was given thousands of dollars from private donations and doesn’t need money from our government. The government needs to focus on getting their shit together. They look like idiots up in congress and can’t even work together. We have other problems that they need to deal with.
    Like (39)
    Follow
    Share
    Hands off your uterus? Get your hands out of my pocket! Do it on your own dime.
    Like (33)
    Follow
    Share
    Stop trying to use legislation to control the choices of Americans regarding their personal health and family planning decisions! If you have a religious or other objection to abortion, use your influence to change hearts and minds of individual Americans. All attempts to use the legislative process to control other Americans personal choices are unconstitutional! Stacking the courts to reverse existing law to control Americans’ personal lifestyle decisions and attempting to force a religious point of view on those who do not share your views is unAmerican!
    Like (28)
    Follow
    Share
    Stop legislating your religious beliefs! You do not care about the women sexually assaulted by Trump or other Republicans. You put a straight up rapist on the Supreme Court. You are just distracting people with abortion, so they do not notice how you are robbing us blind with your Voodoo economics. Wake up people! They are distracting you with abortion in their right hand, while they stab you in the back with their left hand.
    Like (28)
    Follow
    Share
    This appears to be another move to limit women's rights to care for their own bodies.
    Like (26)
    Follow
    Share
    👍🏻 House Bill H.R. 219 AKA the No Abortion Bonds Act 👍🏻 I’m in support of and recommend the passage of this House bill H.R. 219 AKA the No Abortion Bonds Act — would impose taxes on state, local, and tax credit bonds that are used to build a facility owned or used by an abortion provider for more than 30 days during a year in which interest is paid on the bond. Since the Hyde Amendment already bans the use of federal funds for abortion services, and construction bonds are essentially a federal subsidy, it follows that federal tax-exempt bonds shouldn’t be used to support abortion clinics in any way — including by funding their construction. An entity wouldn’t be considered an “abortion provider” if the abortions it performs are only in the cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger. ANY form of abortion, from conception to the now “Infamous Forth Trimester Abortion” should be banned except that of cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger. SneakyPete.......... 🙅🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🙅‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️. 2*17*19............
    Like (26)
    Follow
    Share
    Why don’t you stop legislating Catholic doctrine? Stop enforcing the views of misogyny of men who define women as “hosts”.
    Like (25)
    Follow
    Share
    Just leave women’s bodies alone.
    Like (24)
    Follow
    Share
    People should make their own choices and decisions about their own bodies. And in this case, if you don’t have a uterus - sit down and keep quiet!!!
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    All these, mostly men comments about the abortion clinics killing innocent lives and they don’t want their tax dollars used to kill innocent babies, I say they are so indoctrinated that they can’t see the truth. What about all the innocent babies their tax dollars killed in the carpet bombings of WW2 or Vietnam and on, and on. Such Hypocrites!!
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE