Should the Johnson Amendment be Repealed to Let Churches and Tax-Exempt Groups Engage in Politics? (H.R. 172)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 172?
(Updated May 14, 2020)
This bill would repeal the tax code’s prohibition against churches and other tax-exempt organizations participating in political campaigns or opposing candidates for public office that was imposed by the 1954 Johnson Amendment. It would apply to taxable years ending after this bill’s enactment, and wouldn’t invalidate or limit any provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.
Argument in favor
Churches and other religious or secular tax-exempt organizations have the right to free speech just as much as individuals and businesses, and as a result they should be able to participate in political campaigns without losing their privileged tax status.
Argument opposed
Tax exempt organizations — whether they’re churches or not — shouldn’t be able to get involved in political campaigns and endorse candidates while maintaining their tax exempt status. It’s inappropriate to mix politics with religious institutions.
Impact
Churches and other tax-exempt groups; political campaigns; and the IRS.
Cost of H.R. 172
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC) has been a longtime opponent of the Johnson Amendment, and has introduced legislation that would let churches and tax-exempt groups engage in political activities while remaining tax exempt since 2001. Jones feels “it’s kind of like big brother, listening to what the minister, or priest or rabbi might be saying” and believes his bill would “return freedom of speech to our nation’s houses of worship so that they may speak out on issues of the day without fear of reprisal from the IRS.”
Public Citizen produced a report detailing its opposition to efforts to undermine the Johnson Amendment, saying that it should remain in place to “protect against further erosion of our campaign finance system and to protect the integrity of our charitable and religious sectors.
This legislation has the support of one cosponsor in the House, Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC).
Of Note: President Donald Trump said in a speech at the National Prayer Breakfast that he will “totally destroy” the Johnson Amendment, and took executive action to prevent the federal government from punishing churches for expressing political views.
Media:
-
Sponsoring Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC)
-
CBN News
-
Council on Foundations
-
McClatchy DC
-
NonProfitTimes
-
Weekly Standard (Previous Version)
-
Americans United (Opposed)
-
Public Citizen (Opposed)
-
Oxford University Press (Partly Opposed)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Diliff / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
IT: Here's how you can help fight for justice in the U.S., and... 📱 Are you concerned about your tech listening to you?Welcome to Thursday, April 18th, communities... Despite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S. read more...
-
Restore Freedom and Fight for Justice With GravvyDespite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S., manifesting itself in a multitude of ways. read more... Criminal Justice Reform
-
Myth or Reality: Is Our Tech Listening?What's the story? As technology has become more advanced, accessible, and personalized, many have noticed increasingly targeted read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
IT: 🧊 Scientists say Antarctic ice melt is inevitable, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Tuesday, April 16th, members... Scientists say Antarctic ice melt is inevitable, implying "dire" climate change read more...