Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 1420

Should Federal Agencies Develop Strategies to Reduce Their Energy Usage?

Argument in favor

The federal government, as the largest energy consumer in the U.S., needs to be as efficient as possible to save taxpayer dollars and the environment. This bill would provide federal agencies with the tools they need to run their data centers more efficiently.

Kristin's Opinion
···
09/09/2019
We need to do everything possible to reduce emissions and transition to clean energy. It is attainable now. America must show leadership at this crucial time.
Like (21)
Follow
Share
···
09/09/2019
Saves money and saves energy. No reason why not.
Like (21)
Follow
Share
J. scott's Opinion
···
09/10/2019
Yes but they already have and do so routinely. Energy consumption has been a concern in government since Jimmy Carter at least with his requirements to lower thermostats. This sounds as if they aren’t doing anything now. Moreover, it will increase their cost to replace old equipment. Just silliness really ...meanwhile the Trumpster is against increasing automotive gas mileage rates. Additionally, he’s taking every penny he can scrounge from departments and agencies for his wall.
Like (16)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

The Dept. of Energy’s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) already helps federal agencies reduce their energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. A new interagency program on this issue isn’t needed.

John's Opinion
···
09/09/2019
Quit making government big brother. Free market has and will continue to reduce and replace energy as the market demands
Like (21)
Follow
Share
JTJ's Opinion
···
09/10/2019
No, let’s reduce the bloated government and close these unconstitutional agencies.
Like (9)
Follow
Share
PistolPete's Opinion
···
09/10/2019
Maybe start with the liberals and the party of Nancy Pelosi spending tax payer money on needless world travel under the guise of diplomacy- when we all know it’s just vacation (esp when they take their families).....hmmmm; yeah stop the hypocrisy first and quit this showtime political nonsense
Like (6)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
      senate Committees
      Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
  • The house Passed September 9th, 2019
    Roll Call Vote 384 Yea / 23 Nay
      house Committees
      Committee on Energy and Commerce
      Energy
    IntroducedFebruary 28th, 2019

Log in or create an account to see how your Reps voted!
    It saves money. Win all around.
    Like (22)
    Follow
    Share
    Quit making government big brother. Free market has and will continue to reduce and replace energy as the market demands
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    We need to do everything possible to reduce emissions and transition to clean energy. It is attainable now. America must show leadership at this crucial time.
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    Saves money and saves energy. No reason why not.
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes but they already have and do so routinely. Energy consumption has been a concern in government since Jimmy Carter at least with his requirements to lower thermostats. This sounds as if they aren’t doing anything now. Moreover, it will increase their cost to replace old equipment. Just silliness really ...meanwhile the Trumpster is against increasing automotive gas mileage rates. Additionally, he’s taking every penny he can scrounge from departments and agencies for his wall.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    Federal agencies have had directive's for energy conservation off and on going back at least 40 years. I do not think that any of them were legislated- but rather mandated by executive action. Certainly, It never hurts to be reminded. I am obviously waffling a bit on this. But, given the attitude of the trump-bunch, legislation is warranted. I fear that a lot of things that were done by administrations more focused on doing what is right instead of what is profitable will require legislative corrective actions. To quote our 'leader', SAD!
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a no-brainer! If we want to make any progress towards protecting our environment and climate than the government needs to become more energy efficient!
    Like (13)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes. It is their dutiful obligation to spend our money as wisely as possible.
    Like (11)
    Follow
    Share
    No, let’s reduce the bloated government and close these unconstitutional agencies.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Reducing energy use should be a federal priority, leading the way
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Congress needs to ask this question? Jeeesh, it should be obvious to agencies to be efficient (including energy use) as part of good management processes.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Reducing energy usage limits the amount of toxicity going into the air which in turn helps our environment.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Sheeeesh!! This is actually a question...for real? Doh...no, the fedl govt should continue to be as inefficient as possible. Actually, seriously speaking, the fedl govt is for the huge part a great parasite. To make it efficient would require shutting down the majority of its useless blood-sucking self and turning the powers over to the States and to WeThePeople, under the terms laid out in our Constitution. The USFedl Govt is the most INefficient parasite of all the govts of the world, and it is very close to destroying its host--us.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Maybe start with the liberals and the party of Nancy Pelosi spending tax payer money on needless world travel under the guise of diplomacy- when we all know it’s just vacation (esp when they take their families).....hmmmm; yeah stop the hypocrisy first and quit this showtime political nonsense
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    More overreach by the socialist democrat job killing party. WIN Win wining 2020
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    As my mother has often joked: all those years she thought she was cheap and it turned out she was being green. Saving money and resources is good common sense.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Absolutely!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    We should all do this. I am proud that my congressman suggested this common sense rule of law
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    This is the biggest joke of the century. I worked for the federal government for 38 years. In the 70’s it was lights out in all buildings except emergency lighting after work hours. Even in our electrical substations yards lights were out and vandalizing was rampant. Turning the heat down down where women would have us place electrical heaters under their desks. With today’s LED lighting and programmable thermostats what more can we do. This is a political joke. If anyone spent money on conservation, it was the Federal government. Buzz Off!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Nooooooooo,absolutely not. The agency already does..Wasting money
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE