Like Countable?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H. Joint Res. 62

Authorizing Military Force if Iran Violates the Nuclear Deal

Argument in favor

Without the threat of military force, Iran is likely to skirt the agreements of the nuclear deal and secretly develop its nuclear capabilities. This doesn’t guarantee that force would even be used, it just establishes a process.

···
09/08/2015
“If Iran does not live up to the agreement, sanctions may be reapplied,” Sanders said. “If Iran moves toward a nuclear weapon, all available options remain on the table. I think it is incumbent upon us, however, to give the negotiated agreement a chance to succeed.” [washingtonpost.com]
Like (68)
Follow
Share
BarackObama's Opinion
···
09/08/2015
"Building a nuclear bomb requires either uranium or plutonium. But thanks to this deal, Iran’s four possible ways to leverage those fissile materials are blocked." [whitehouse.gov]
Like (45)
Follow
Share
···
09/08/2015
“Senator Warren believes we must exhaust every effort to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomacy, and she does not support imposing additional sanctions through new legislation while diplomatic efforts to achieve a long-term agreement are ongoing.” [washingtonpost.com]
Like (27)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

This resolution would give any President a green light to use military force against Iran without seeking approval from Congress. If the U.S. must use force against Iran, it should be debated and agreed upon at that time — not months or years in advance.

DonaldTrump's Opinion
···
09/08/2015
“The deal with Iran will go down as one of the most incompetent ever made. The U.S. lost on virtually every point. We just don't win anymore!” [twitter.com/realdonaldtrump]
Like (54)
Follow
Share
ScottWalker's Opinion
···
09/08/2015
“The deal [supported by this legislation,] and the secret side agreements that continue to emerge, jeopardize our safety and that of our closest allies.” Read more at https://www.scottwalker.com/news/gov-walker-statement-new-iran-deal-revelations
Like (12)
Follow
Share
Thomas's Opinion
···
09/05/2015
Let's talk first. Guns and blood should always be the last action after all other options have been explored.
Like (6)
Follow
Share

Bill Details

Official information provided by the Congressional Research Service. Learn more or make a suggestion.
The Congressional Research Service writes summaries for most legislation. These summaries are listed here. Countable will update some legislation with a revised summary, title or other key elements.

Suggest an update to this bill using our form.

Official Title

To authorize the use of the Armed Forces of the United States against Iran if Iran commits a serious violation of its commitments or obligations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and for other purposes.

Summary

This joint resolution expresses the sense of Congress that: the President should be commended for the commitment to ensure that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon and the willingness to explore a peaceful path to ensure Iran remains free of nuclear weapons; the President and the administration should be commended for exhausting diplomatic means in working with the P5+1 countries to reach the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) agreement with Iran that will ensure that Iran's civilian nuclear program becomes compliant with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) without jeopardizing the capability of the United States and U.S. allies to intervene militarily if such an option becomes necessary; and if the President determines that Iran's nuclear program becomes noncompliant under the JCPA agreement and poses a threat to U.S. national security, then the President should work with Congress to utilize appropriate measures, not limited to military intervention, to eliminate thath threat. The President is authorized to use the U.S. Armed Forces against Iran to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure if the President: certifies to Congress that IAEA inspectors have determined that Iran has failed to comply with its JCPA obligations and the President determines that such failure is serious and a threat to U.S. national security; certifies to Congress that the provisions of the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to the application of sanctions against Iran have been re-imposed as a result of such failure; and provides to Congress a scope and strategy for the use of the Armed Forces. Congress declares that this Act is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution, and that nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution. The President shall report to, and consult with, Congress on matters relevant to this joint resolution. Nothing in this joint resolution shall be construed to interfere or violate the President's inherent right to authorize limited military force in self-defense pursuant to the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution.

joint resolution Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house has not voted
      house Committees
      Committee on Foreign Affairs
    IntroducedJuly 29th, 2015
    “If Iran does not live up to the agreement, sanctions may be reapplied,” Sanders said. “If Iran moves toward a nuclear weapon, all available options remain on the table. I think it is incumbent upon us, however, to give the negotiated agreement a chance to succeed.” [washingtonpost.com]
    Like (68)
    Follow
    Share
    “The deal with Iran will go down as one of the most incompetent ever made. The U.S. lost on virtually every point. We just don't win anymore!” [twitter.com/realdonaldtrump]
    Like (54)
    Follow
    Share
    "Building a nuclear bomb requires either uranium or plutonium. But thanks to this deal, Iran’s four possible ways to leverage those fissile materials are blocked." [whitehouse.gov]
    Like (45)
    Follow
    Share
    “Senator Warren believes we must exhaust every effort to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomacy, and she does not support imposing additional sanctions through new legislation while diplomatic efforts to achieve a long-term agreement are ongoing.” [washingtonpost.com]
    Like (27)
    Follow
    Share
    “The deal [supported by this legislation,] and the secret side agreements that continue to emerge, jeopardize our safety and that of our closest allies.” Read more at https://www.scottwalker.com/news/gov-walker-statement-new-iran-deal-revelations
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    Contrary to what the opposing view of this bill said, congress is still required to pass a declaration of war. Iran is responsible for many U.S. Service members deaths. Congress's inability to stop this so called treaty is going to create many issues down the road so that being said I would like congress to have the ability to do what they need due to the ignorance of the president and his cabinet.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Let's talk first. Guns and blood should always be the last action after all other options have been explored.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    If Obama knew of any violations he would ignore it. It certainly would take the rest of his term to react, then in Jan 2017, as ex-president, he would criticize the new president for wagering war on a country he made peace with in 2015.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Give the U.S. Military a break people.. we don't need constant war, we do not need to make more of our citizens veterans. We do not need a repeat of the Iraq War
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Their nuclear / military sites should have already been destroyed over the past decade of thumbing their nose at the U.N.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    "The Iran Deal demonstrates the tradition of American leadership to make our country, and the world, a safer place."[twitter.com/VP]
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Why look for ANY reason to go to war? The Middle East has been a waste of taxpayer money for half a century. Why continue.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Why is war the answer to EVERYTHING!!!
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The use of force is implicit in the deal as it stands. If George W. Bush taught us nothing else, it is that congress needs to have a say in whether or not we go to war & that members of congress need to be on record as being for or against. There also needs to be a check on presidential power if we misguidedly elect another neo-con. Even those of us who are for the deal are not naive enough to think enforcement is not essential. Nevertheless, it seems unwise to assume, before congress has even gotten around to taking a vote, that going to war is imminent. The point of diplomacy is, after all, to AVOID war. Just saying...
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Iran will inevitably violate this deal (they already have). We should already be destroying their missile silos and nuclear plants. They are given too much opportunity to increase military infrastructure and threaten the United States and our Allies
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Seems a little provocative at this time, especially if one would prefer further helpful negotiations.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    There needs to be real deterrents in place to keep Iran from breaking their agreement. Furthermore, we need something in place that has a quick effect in the case our government needs to act. Extra sanctions wouldn't have a quick effect, military presence would.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    If any treaty is broken, the country I violation deserves to be retaliated against.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    This should be passed so that Iran knows the consequences if they do break the nuclear deal. This is more of a "threat" to Iran to not break the deal, than wasting defense money on Iran.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Most of the folks that want to wage military strength against anyone have never been in the military.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE