In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-TX) introduced this resolution to terminate the national emergency related to border security declared by President Donald Trump:
“Historically, Presidents have declared national emergencies for urgent matters of national security. President Trump would unconstitutionally usurp congressional authority by declaring an emergency based upon unfounded hype rather than any substantive emergency. Border crossings are lower than they have been in four decades. There are more law enforcement officers at the border — some stationed there simply to make good on politicians’ anti-immigrant rhetoric — than ever before. Further, such a baseless declaration by President Trump would set a dangerous precedent regarding the constitutional balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wrote a “dear colleague” letter to encourage lawmakers to cosponsor Castro’s resolution, which read in part:
“All Members take an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution. The President’s decision to go outside the bounds of the law to try to get what he failed to achieve in the constitutional legislative process violates the Constitution and must be terminated. We have a solemn responsibility to uphold the Constitution, and defend our system of checks and balances against the President’s assault.”
President Donald Trump has threatened to veto this bill if it were to reach his desk. Some House Republicans have expressed opposition to Democrats’ efforts to end President Trump’s border security emergency declaration. House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-GA) offered the following statement:
“Declaring a national emergency is a sobering act, which is why Congress enacted a statute governing when and how the president can take this action. House Democrats’ angst over Congress’ power of the purse is unwarranted, especially since the commander in chief’s authority to redirect military funds for a national emergency is affirmed in a law passed by their own branch.
Even as House Democrats are introducing a resolution of disapproval to terminate this national emergency, they’re running to handpicked federal courts to negate the president’s lawful action. That demonstrates at least two points: First, Democrats don’t have the votes to pass a veto-proof resolution to terminate the national emergency or to amend the National Emergencies Act through the proper democratic process. Second, they’re willing to cede Congressional authority to courts when it suits their agenda, so their appeal to the ‘legislative process’ invalidates itself. This is political expedience in action.”
This bill has the support of 225 cosponsors, all of whom are Democrats except for Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI).
Of Note: President Trump declared a national emergency to access $3.6 billion in funding from the Dept. of Defense’s military construction budget and use it to build barriers on the southern border (an additional $3.1 billion will come through other executive actions).
California filed suit against the Trump administration’s emergency declaration and has since been joined by 15 other states in the effort.
Summary by Eric Revell(Photo Credit: Customs and Border Protection / Public Domain)