by Countable | 8.14.17
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) is holding an in-person town hall August 22 for the first time since being elected in 2016. Constituents are required to submit their names for a lottery to win one of the 135 seats available in the planned venue. Fitzpatrick represents over 700,000 constituents.
Constituents can still call their Members of Congress, send them emails and even old-fashioned letters. Is that enough? Do you think representatives can actually represent their constituents if they don’t meet them face-to-face?
Should Members of Congress be required to have town halls? If so, should they have to choose large venues or have multiple, smaller events in order to see a baseline number of constituents?
If constituents engage in personal attacks and vitriol against their representatives at town halls, is that adequate justification for controlling the events more tightly?
Use the Take Action button to tell your reps what you think!
— Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: Wikimedia / Creative Commons)
Written by Countable
Yes, of course they are. If they won't hold them they shouldn't be public servants
Absolutely! And any senator or representative who won't have one needs to be recalled and removed
If you can't take the pressure and criticism of public life, go get another job, get off my payroll and pay for your own healthcare
Yes. Especially now where a lot of representatives are isolating themselves and only listening to a small minority's opinions. They need to listen to ALL of us.
Town halls, not listening sessions are absolutely necessary. Everyone should be invited, not be invitations only.
Yes. Representatives should face their constituents and get their unfiltered responses.
Town hall meetings are an essential part of the Democratic process and should be held monthly so the public voice and demands can be heard by the elected officials to carry out the wishes of the public. This process should be mandatory for all elected and appointed officials.
Holding town halls is one of a Congressperson's many important responsibilities. A town hall session is one of the best ways for constituents to make sure their representatives in Congress know and fight for their values. The more a Congressperson communicates with their constituents, the better they can represent the area.
DUH!!! It is an opportunity for constituents to directly voice their opinions to their representatives. FOR REPRESENTATIVES IT IS PART OF YOUR JOB TO LISTEN TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS!!!!
Absolutely! Our elected officials work for US! They should be held accountable to the will of the people and not beholden to corporate interests.
I think that anyone who wants to represent us should be required by law to conduct a town hall at least yearly (and open to all). If you don't want to do that, resign.
ABSOLUTELY! They are our "representatives", therefore, they are supposed to represent us. It is hard enough to get heard as an average citizen over the noise and power of special interest. Town halls provide on of the few opportunities to speak to our representatives in person. We get a chance to tell our stories ask our questions and participate in democracy.
Town halls are essential for communication. Communication allows for problem solving
Absolutely! Unfortunately attendance at them has been low for many years prior to Trump's election. I'm guilty as well but I will NEVER bury my head I the sand again and will stay watchful of every member of our government for the rest of my life, stay engaged, and communicate my views to my own representatives and as many others that I can get in front of.
Town halls are one of the only ways to get face to face feedback both ways. It should be a requirement for reps and senators to have to stand before their constituents at least every 6 months through out their terms. This mechanism of expression provides an arena for "real" debate and "real" information to be passed on from the people represented.
The lack of real town halls is a symptom of the demise of democracy in America. Screened questions are not acceptable. Limiting participants is not acceptable. Telephone town halls are not acceptable. Representative democracy simply does not work when the 'representatives' refuse to hear the input of their electorate.
Members of Congress are elected to represent us. We deserve face to face meetings with them. Rep. Thomas MacArthur rarely meets with us, and when he does he preloads the room with his friends and supporters, some from outside of his district. The people who disagree with him are never rude or abusive (unlike the Tea Party people who took over Democrats town halls), but they are often frustrated and feel ignored. I fax him regularly. When I get a response, it's a boilerplate "I'll keep your views on mind" letter that never really addresses the issue. I don't feel he really represents most of New Jersey's 3rd district. C'mon Democrats: vote!!
When my Representatives choose to not hold town halls it tells me they know their votes do not represent their constituents but they don't care. And they are cowards to not face their constituents.
Town halls are essential for representative democracy and it is disgraceful and cowardly that Roy Blunt refuses to hold them.
If you are too cowardly to face the people you swore to represent, then you do not belong as a servant of the people.