Court Rules Trump Admin Must Enforce Obama-Era Restriction on Oil & Gas Companies
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
What’s the story?
A federal court has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enforce an Obama administration climate regulation known as "the methane rule." The regulation places pollution limits on the oil and gas industry, and requires that companies locate and fix methane leaks. Methane is among the most potent greenhouse gasses, and is therefore a major contributor to global climate change.
The context:
President Trump issued an executive order in late March mandating that the EPA review all energy regulations put in place during the Obama administration. The order directed the EPA to suspend, rescind or revise those rules.
In response, Trump's EPA head Scott Pruitt said in April that the agency would "reconsider" the methane rule. In June, Pruitt issued a notice advising that the EPA would block the rule's enforcement for two years, giving energy companies time to review the rule and the public time to comment.
Environmental groups responded with a lawsuit in federal court, and in July the D.C. Circuit Court ruled Pruitt’s agency “lacked authority” to halt the regulation. This week's decision goes even further: it requires the EPA to enforce the methane rule.
Why does it matter?
Methane contributes to global warming. Though the extremely potent gas can come from natural sources, the greatest industrial emissions come from the oil and gas industry. When the Obama administration issued its ruling, it said the rule would help slash methane emissions by 40-45 percent by 2025.
The recent ruling means that the EPA can still reconsider the Obama administration rule, but energy industry groups have to comply with it in the meantime. The lead attorney for the Environmental Defense Fund said the ruling "protects families and communities across America under clean air safeguards that EPA Administrator sought to unlawfully tear down." But a spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute said that the momentary pause was “needed to allow for regulatory certainty as EPA continues the formal process to review the rule making."
What can you do?
Pruitt has said he wants to pause various rules and regulations so the public has time to comment—so comment. Does the EPA need to pause regulations until industries, and the public, can weigh on? Or should they be forced to comply with previous administrations’ rulings? Use the Take Action button to tell your reps what you think!
— Josh Herman & Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: Tim Evanson via Flickr / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
🌎 Are You Ready To Take Action Against Climate Change?Scientists claim that last year "smashed" the record for the hottest year by a large margin , offering a "dramatic testimony" of read more... Environment
-
Should U.S. Implement a New Tax on AI to Fund Worker Benefits?The debate As technology advances, artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into our society. While leaders in AI read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
SCOTUS Hears Arguments of Abortion Pill Mifepristone CaseUpdated March 27, 2024, 12:30 p.m. EST On Tuesday, March 26, the Supreme Court heard arguments about the mifepristone case, read more... Women's Health
-
IT: ⛑️ It's American Red Cross Giving Day, and... How will you give back today?Welcome to Wednesday, March 27th, philanthropists and entrepreneurs... It's American Red Cross Giving Day - a time to ensure the read more...