What Are “Sore Loser” Laws, and Do They Polarize Our Politics?
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
The story
Ex-coal CEO Don Blankenship’s effort to run as a third-party candidate in the West Virginia Senate race after losing his bid for the GOP nomination is likely to spark a fierce legal battle.
Why? Because of something called a “sore loser” law.
Definition
Generally speaking, a sore loser law prevents candidates who lost a primary election from taking advantage of later filing deadlines to run on a third-party ticket.
In most states that have them, these laws don’t apply to presidential candidates. Michigan’s is one of the few that does, and it prevented Gary Johnson from joining the presidential ballot as a Libertarian in 2012.
Many states accomplish the same requirement by having simultaneous registration dates for the primary and the general election.
Only the states of Connecticut, Iowa, New York, and Vermont have neither a sore-loser law nor simultaneous registration deadlines.
Purpose and impact
Supporters of sore loser laws say they keep politicians in check by limiting the steps they can take to get elected.
Detractors, however, say that sore loser laws are designed to foster major-party rule and prevent dissent.
Studies have also shown that the laws can also have the effect of forcing major-party candidates into extreme positions. According to one study on the subject:
“Sore loser laws bring more ideologically extreme candidates into the party nomination process rather than allowing them to run separately in the general election, thus encouraging primary candidates to adopt more extreme positions to win nomination... Without a sore loser law in place, the incumbent faces less pressure to associate himself with extreme positions.”
Other studies reflect similar findings.
In a 2014 New York Times Op-Ed, Mickey Edwards, vice president at the Aspen Institute and former Oklahoma Republican representative, wrote:
“These laws deprive voters of a full array of choices. They are arguably even more insidious than partisan redistricting, which affects House races but not Senate ones.”
Upcoming challenges
Blankenship is not the only one likely to challenge sore loser laws in court. In June, North Carolina passed a retroactive sore loser law, enabling it to remove Constitution Party candidates from the ballot. The party plans legal action in that case, as well.
What do you think?
Should sore loser laws remain in place? Why or why not? Hit Take Action to tell your reps what you think, then share your thoughts below.
—Sara E. Murphy
(Photo Credit: iStock.com / teddyandmia)
The Latest
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated Apr. 23, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST Protests are growing on college campuses across the country, inspired by the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Here's how you can help fight for justice in the U.S., and... 📱 Are you concerned about your tech listening to you?Welcome to Thursday, April 18th, communities... Despite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S. read more...
-
Restore Freedom and Fight for Justice With GravvyDespite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S., manifesting itself in a multitude of ways. read more... Criminal Justice Reform
-
Myth or Reality: Is Our Tech Listening?What's the story? As technology has become more advanced, accessible, and personalized, many have noticed increasingly targeted read more... Artificial Intelligence