by Countable | 2.27.18
A federal appeals court in Manhattan has ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects against discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Last year, the Trump administration filed a court brief stating that Congress had not intended Title VII to extend to sexual orientation.
"Sexual orientation discrimination – which is motivated by an employer’s opposition to romantic association between particular sexes – is discrimination based on the employee’s own sex," Judge Robert Katzmann wrote in the 10-3 opinion issued by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Katzmann wrote that even though Congress had not addressed gay bias in Title VII, laws "often go beyond the principal evil to cover reasonably comparable evils."
The ruling only applies to the 2nd Circuit Court's jurisdiction, which includes Connecticut, New York, and Vermont.
Donald Zarda, a skydive instructor with Altitude Express, had reassured a nervous female customer not to worry about their close physical contact because he was "100-percent gay." The woman’s boyfriend complained to Altitude Express, who fired Zarda.
Zarda died in a base-jumping accident in 2014. But his sister said of the court’s ruling:
"I think this would have meant the world to him. I think he would have been very excited and very encouraged. I feel strongly that in the workplace employees should be evaluated based on their job performance and by their work ethic and never by who they love."
Devin O’Malley, a DOJ spokesman, said in an emailed statement:
"We remain committed to the fundamental principle that the courts cannot expand the law beyond what Congress provided. The position that the department advocated in this case has been its longstanding position across administrations and remains the law of nine different Courts of Appeals."
Should Congress consider an official expansion of Title VII to include sexual orientation? Hit Take Action and tell your reps, then share your thoughts below.
(Photo Credit: Dendron / iStock)
Written by Countable
I’m pretty sure you agree with me that sexual orientation needs protection. We need to return to protecting and taking care of each other—all of us, regardless of orientation, ability, age, ethnicity, documentation.
Of course it should be expanded to cover sexual orientation. We can't pretend like these people don't need protections as we see quantifiable examples of LBGT people falling victim to discrimination every single day.
It’s nice to see the courts are not seeing the people of this country with the eyes of evil like the Republican Party and there base of bigots and the fact the trump admin filed the case says everything we need to know about cadet bone spurs
How many friggin times do we have to waste the court’s time with things that were already decided Start charging the individuals, states, counties, and individuals for the use of my services for this garbage We’ve been wasting time on roe v wade for close to 50 years Funny how the ones screaming family values the loudest are tapping their feet in public restrooms, getting caught with kiddie porn, screwing porn stars, cheating on their spouses, and blackmailing their lovers
We need to stop discrimination wherever it occurs and to whomever gets discriminated. It is the year 2018 and we need to protect all people regardless of their race, age, religion, sexuality and their gender. We need to stop the backward thinking and start moving forward. Every single life is sacred and deserves to be treated appropriately
I don’t understand why your sexual orientation should even come up in the work place.
People like the money grubbing dictator worshipping republicans and whoever paxamericana scare the hell out if me..but they deserve protection LIKE ALL PEOPLE DO..AND KEEP YOUR OPINIONS OUT IF MY BEDROOM!
Glad to see this, of course people should be protected from discrimination based on who they’re attracted to.
This court proves that when you step out of the distorted prism of Trump’s world we can see clearly. Nearly all of this administration’s legal challenges were defeated by fair thinking, reasonable people who actually understand fairness and justice. If the courts and our citizens can stand up to this bully why can’t congress? Remember who you work for and what our country stands for. Stand up to Trump and nullify his presidency.
We obviously need a “marriage amendment” to the US Constitution. Maybe as a result of a convention of states. One that defines marriage as it genuinely is: “between one man, and one woman.” I applaud Bermuda for rescinding their new gay marriage laws earlier this year. Maybe if the Supreme Court would quit legislating from the bench, America could too. This decision, however, is quite sad.
Of course these laws should apply to everyone. No one should be discriminated against, even the shitty republicans pushing their hate agenda should be fairly treated
CIVIL RIGHTS ARE GUARANTEED BY THE US CONSTITUTION!! It protects EVERYONE in our country. WHY ARE THE COURTS EVEN RULING ON THIS? It’s a given
I spiritually identify as a cannabis healer. I demand equal rights and protection under the law.
Glad to see the courts honoring civil rights.
It’s about time.
Well this took long enough. Now, how about we move from theory to practice??
Glad to see the courts making this official. This is a huge win for all minority groups, especially the LGBTQ+ community.
As a gay man, I need my elected officials standing up for my rights especially with the current regime being vehemently anti-LGBT.