by Countable | 12.11.18
We've transferred a summary of the version of the Farm Bill that the Senate passed on an 86-11 vote in June 2018 here, because H.R. 2 has now been amended with the Farm Bill conference report.
In its current form, this bill — the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 — would reauthorize numerous U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA) programs through the 2023 crop year, reform the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), in addition to making it easier for farmers and ranchers to access credit, crop insurance, and international markets. Detailed summaries of the 1,120 page bill’s various sections can be found below.
This section would aim to maintain and strengthen the Price Loss Coverage (PLC) and Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) programs and allow participating farmers to make a new election between them. The programs provide farmers with protection against adverse changes in market conditions, and would be reauthorized through 2023. Payments under ARC would be based on the physical location of the farm.
Dairy policy would be maintained and strengthened through several provisions. The Margin Protection Program would be renamed the Dairy Risk Coverage program. Premiums under the program would vary, as dairy operations with a production history of less than 2 million pounds and between 2 & 10 million pounds would receive discounts.
The USDA’s marketing loan program, which helps farmers store their production so they can market their crops throughout the year rather than selling when commodity prices are low at harvest-time, would be reauthorized for the 2019 through 2023 crop years.
This section would maintain and reform nutrition assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (aka food stamps or SNAP). It would reform SNAP’s work requirement by directing states to consult with the state workforce development board or local employers to design the state’s employment and training program to meet local needs. States which include job search as a component of their program would be required to have at least one additional employment and training component.
State workforce agencies and the Secretary of Agriculture would be authorized to certify workforce partnerships operated by a private employer or nonprofit organization, which would serve as an additional means for individuals to satisfy employment and training requirements. Workforce partnerships wouldn’t receive funding under the Food and Nutrition Act. A process would be established for referral or reassessment of individuals determined to be ill-suited to the employment and training component to which they’d been referred.
Farmers’ markets and direct marketing farmers would be allowed to operate a point of sale EBT device at more than one location under the same SNAP retailer authorization, enabling them to expand access to their produce. The USDA would be required to review state EBT contract service agreements and the compatibility of those systems with USDA fraud monitoring systems.
In-kind food aid would be retained as the foundation of U.S. food aid while oversight, monitoring, and program evaluation for food aid programs would be strengthened. Labeling requirements would appropriately convey the generosity of the American people. Among the programs maintained by the section are: Food for Peace, Food for Progress, McGovern-Dole, Farmer-to-Farmer, Local and Regional Procurement, the Cochran Fellowship Program, the Borlaug International Agricultural Science and Technology Fellowship Program, the Global Crop Diversity Trust, and the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust.
The Beginning Farmer and Rancher Individual Development Accounts Pilot Program would be maintained with matching funds for savings accounts, and reserves a portion of ownership and operating loans for beginning farmers and ranchers. Military and related experience would be allowed to count toward 3-years of experience required prior to an application for an ownership loan.
The Conservation Loan and Loan Guarantee program would be maintained to help farmers and ranchers implement conservation measures on their land. Loan limits for individual farmers and ranchers would be updated for the first time in 16 years, enabling producers to access the credit they need to produce their crops.
This section would provide full funding for the Specialty Crop Research Initiative and eliminate mandatory funding for citrus research. It’d increase funding for the Organic Agriculture Research & Extension Initiative to provide resources for combating fraudulent imports of organic products coming into the U.S. The farm bill would promote research on the development of mechanization and automation of labor-intensive tasks on farms and in packing facilities.
A grant program would be established for each 1890 land grant university to award scholarships to individuals pursuing a career in food and agricultural sciences.
Farmers and ranchers; people receiving food assistance under SNAP; state agriculture and forestry agencies; and the USDA.
The CBO estimates that enacting this bill would cost $24.3 billion over the 2019-2023 period to fund USDA programs. It would also increase direct spending by $3.2 billion over the 2019-2023 period and $500 million over the 2019-2028 period.
In-Depth: Sponsoring Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) introduced this bipartisan Farm Bill to reauthorize and reform USDA programs:
“When Ranking Member Stabenow and I started this journey in Manhattan, Kansas, last year, we made a commitment to make tough choices and produce a good, bipartisan Farm Bill… Whether it’s low prices, over burdensome regulations, or unpredictable trade markets, it’s no secret that farmers and ranchers are struggling. That’s why we need a Farm Bill that works for all producers across all regions. Simply put, our producers need predictability -- and that’s just what this bill provides.”
Original cosponsor Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) added:
“From day one, Chairman Roberts and I agreed we would craft a bipartisan bill that works for farmers, families, and rural communities. The bipartisan Senate Farm Bill goes above and beyond to provide certainty for rural America and our diverse agricultural economy in MIchigan and throughout the country. From revitalizing small towns, to promoting good stewardship of our land and water, to expanding local food economies, this Farm Bill is a major bipartisan victory.”
The Senate Agriculture Committee passed this bill unanimously.
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Slavica / iStock)
Written by Countable