Will the GOP Go After Abortion Through Title X?
Join us and tell your reps how you feel!
What’s the story?
The Washington Post reports the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) will soon issue an annual "notice of funding" for Title X. With the collapse of healthcare reform, it may be the easiest way for anti-abortion members of the GOP to restrict access to abortion, by drastically limiting the ability for family planning providers to provide the full range of family planning services.
What is Title X?
Title X is the federal family planning program, established in 1970 as part of the Public Health Service Act. The program provides comprehensive family planning and related preventative health services primarily to low-income and uninsured individuals at little to no cost. The goal of the program is to provide positive birth outcomes and healthy families by offering individuals the ability to choose the number and spacing of their children.
Everything from contraception to cancer screenings to testing and treatment of sexually transmitted disease, as well as pregnancy counseling, are provided by the program. According to the 2016 Title X annual report, the program provides funding to almost 4000 sites in all 50 states. In 2016 the federal government provided $286.5 million to family planning and related services through the program.
President Ronald Reagan restricted the program in the 1980s. He enacted rules that barred participating providers from referring patients to abortion providers, counseling patients that abortion was available or sharing finances or a physical location with a provider of abortions. President Bill Clinton rescinded that rule in 1993.
Anti-abortion advocates have taken issue with Title X funding in recent years because they believe that by providing funding money to providers who also offer abortions, even if federal money never directly pays for abortion services, indirectly enables abortions to continue. One of those advocates, Teresa Manning, now administers Title X as deputy undersecretary for DHHS’s Office of Population Affairs. Manning previously lobbied for the National Right to Life, a prominent anti-abortion group.
The administration also released an HHS strategic plan last month that stated that life begins at conception, a shift from the previous administration.
Possible changes to the program could include barring funding to any provider who also provides abortion services, limiting the types of contraception covered, or force a shift in focus from birth control to abstinence. In the spring a rule was enacted to give states a choice to restrict Title X funding to providers that also provide abortion, but that restriction is not yet universal to the Title X program.
Barring funding to providers who also provide abortion services would prevent any funding from going to Planned Parenthood, long a focus of GOP anti-choice activism. The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice group originally founded by Planned Parenthood, has been raising alarm bells about possible rule changes:
Excluding #PlannedParenthood from #TitleX would overburden other safety-net #familyplanning providers. https://t.co/xi7OELPefr pic.twitter.com/kaOncjaDtX
— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher) October 28, 2017
Ideological attacks on #TitleX are shortsighted & fly in face of program’s enormous health & economic benefits. https://t.co/tppR22zvcQ pic.twitter.com/9DNDbMPcYg
— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher) October 31, 2017
What do you think?
Should new rules be enacted to restrict Title X funding, or change the nature of its services or focus?
Tell us in the comments what you think, then use the Take Action button to tell your reps!
— Asha Sanaker
(Photo Credit: Sarah C via Flickr / Creative Commons)
RELATED READING:
The Trump administration’s attack on family planning is an attack on women’s economic well-being — Washington Post
Pro-Life Progress Report: Mixed Record for Congress — National Catholic Register
The war on birth control — Baltimore Sun
The Latest
-
IT: Here's how you can help fight for justice in the U.S., and... 📱 Are you concerned about your tech listening to you?Welcome to Thursday, April 18th, communities... Despite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S. read more...
-
Restore Freedom and Fight for Justice With GravvyDespite being deep into the 21st century, inequity and injustice burden the U.S., manifesting itself in a multitude of ways. read more... Criminal Justice Reform
-
Myth or Reality: Is Our Tech Listening?What's the story? As technology has become more advanced, accessible, and personalized, many have noticed increasingly targeted read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
IT: 🧊 Scientists say Antarctic ice melt is inevitable, and... Do you think Trump is guilty?Welcome to Tuesday, April 16th, members... Scientists say Antarctic ice melt is inevitable, implying "dire" climate change read more...