by Countable | 9.22.17
Good Tuesday morning everyone, from all of Team Countable, and from me, Managing Editor Andrea Seabrook. Here’s what your government is doing today:
Most of the media will obsessively pick-over President Trump’s speech at the United Nations this morning, and you can too! Watch it live or archived here. To be fair, the political press will keep an eye on Vice President Mike Pence, who’s back in Washington whipping Senate Republicans on their last-ditch attempt to repeal Obamacare. Check out our round-up of the Graham-Cassidy bill.
Meanwhile, insiders’ eyes are on the Senate today, though not because it’s doing anything interesting on the floor. Believe it or not, it’s actually a legislative hearing in the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee that’s the buzz of DC, SF, PA (that’s Palo Alto), Redmond, and 1 Infinite Loop: "S. 1693, The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017," or SESTA.
Seems pretty simple, right? The Internet Biggies should be thrilled to cooperate with Congress on anything that helps stop the vile criminals who traffic and/or solicit children for sex over the internet.
But it’s not simple. And in this critical case, those Internet Biggies aren’t cooperating with Congress at all — they’re fighting it.
See, SESTA would amend one particular part of a 20+ year old bill called — and hang with me here for a sec — Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Internet insiders call it simply CDA 230.
As the web was exploding in the mid-90s, a huge legal question arose: who’s responsible for bad things posted on the internet? Can prosecutors target ISPs and websites that merely handle the content posted by individual users?
CDA 230 established the legal principle that No, sites and ISPs are generally not responsible for users’ posts. In simpler terms, Congress enshrined into law a kind of "don’t shoot the messenger" principle, based on the Constitution’s First Amendment right of free speech.
That has meant, for 20+ years, Internet Biggies like Google and Facebook have enjoyed relative immunity from legal actions. But…
It has also meant that, for 20+ years, Internet Biggies haven’t faced legal repercussions for enabling vile, criminal activity to take place on their networks. Most do voluntarily work to ferret-out and shut down such sites. But…
Some companies, like the infamous sex-peddler Backpage.com, have appeared to take advantage of CDA 230’s protections with the express purpose of escaping legal liability for — and making LOTS of money off of — enabling sex-trafficking rings to operate on their site.
Now some in Congress want to amend CDA 230 in hopes of shutting down sites that enable the trafficking of children for sex. That’s where The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act comes in.
SESTA has a lot of support in Congress — both chambers, both parties. But it’s also got a lot of Internet Biggies fighting against it, not to mention top internet & civil rights groups, like the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF), the ACLU, R Street Institute and others.
So if you’re wondering what’ll be on the screens this morning of big tech execs, lobbyists and activists of all stripes? It’s likely to be the live feed of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee’s hearing on SESTA. Watch it live at 10:30am EDT or archived here, and be assured that we at Countable will keep you updated as well.
President Trump speaks at the UN at 10am EDT: Live & archived video here
Participates in UN General Assembly meeting
Meets with Amir of Qatar
Along with First Lady Melania Trump, hosts diplomatic reception & gives remarks.
Vice President Mike Pence is back in Washington whipping Senate Republicans on the new GOP Obamacare attempt, the Graham-Cassidy bill.
10:30am EDT: Hearing in Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, S.1693, to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify that section 230 of that Act does not prohibit the enforcement against providers and users of interactive computer services of Federal and State criminal and civil law relating to sex trafficking.
10:00am EDT: Hearing in Foreign Relations Committee, including the consideration of the nomination of Jon M. Huntsman, Jr., of Utah, to be Ambassador to Russia.
10:00am EDT: Hearing in Armed Services Committee to examine recent Navy incidents at sea.
Behind the scenes, GOP leaders madly whipping votes for last-ditch effort on Obamacare repeal.
Lots more tomorrow, folks. Please send any tips, ideas, questions and complaints. Always happy to talk. See you tomorrow.
-- Andrea Seabrook, Managing Editor
Talk to Andrea directly, @RadioBabe. Hit the Take Action button to tell your Reps what you think.
Written by Countable
The "Don't shoot the messenger" principle makes sense, but it should be more specific. If the website is behind the message, they should be prosecuted. If it is a website like reddit where uses post their own content, the website should still be able to be open to investigation in case it is sponsoring illegal content. The courts are there for a reason: to determine who, if anyone, is at fault. Don't maintain a law which grants exemption to every website out there as people will begin to abuse it. Make a law which strikes a balance between security and freedom.
The internet biggies are probably fighting this bill because the language may be too broad and could be used to go after anyone; Consenting adults of a controversial nature, any sexual lifestyle conservatives in power may just be against, news media unfriendly to them, pro-choice material... maybe it needs to be ironed out and improved to target just human trafficking. Or just use NSA, they have records of every thing we do online anyway seems to me it would be easy to crack down on a site committing international crimes. And it stop being a waste of every ones time and money if they recovered missing kids.
With regard to sesta go after the sex offenders and leave the rest of our internet alone. This is dangerous when you try to choose for people what they can read or watch on the Internet. It is censorship which I am vehemently opposed to. But child pornography and sex trafficking have no place here or anywhere else that makes it easy for these perverts to peddle their sickness and exploitation. Be specific with this bill and read it carefully. Do not censure.
I have recommended this site to so many people telling them how neutral this site is. I don't know who's idea it was to make Countable another leftist propaganda tool but, I'm going to uninstall this app and make sure everyone know this has turned into a cradle for the to tell each other how correct they are without 1 second of research. Since I'm not a part of your echo chamber, I sadly say goid by to the newest member of the Democratic propaganda machine. By the way, when you say We the People remember HALF OF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VOTED FOR TRUMP. Once again, silver-spooning, elite Liberals are ignoring the other half of the nation. And in your blind, deaf, bias, and prejudice, there are still millions of us.
Government should stay out of my life and internet
What happened to good old fashioned police work? Leave our Internet alone Law enforcement knows where the criminals are, so go get them Leave our civil rights and privacy rights alone
I favor SESTA!
Create a new web extension for all relationship sites. Then it would be easier to see if someone is marketing or soliciting inappropriately on the .com web. The internet police can direct them to the appropriate place for such activity, and also look into what it is that they are actually soliciting.