by Axios | Updated on 9.21.18
Between July and September of this year, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested 41 people who had come forward as potential sponsors of undocumented migrant children. 70% of those arrests were due to the sponsors — who are often the child's family members — being in the U.S. illegally, CNN's Tal Kopan reports.
Why it matters: Health and Human Services recently instituted stricter vetting procedures including background checks and finger printing for all potential immigrant child sponsors. Immigration advocates have feared that this information would be used by the Trump administration to round up more undocumented immigrants in the U.S.
The big picture: While the administration says they increased vetting standards for the children's protection, there has been concern that it would deter sponsors from coming forward — especially if they are undocumented.
The bottom line: HHS is having to deal with record number of immigrant children, and time spent in HHS shelters has doubled since 2016. Meanwhile, the temporary tent facilities being used to house migrant children in HHS care have tripled in size, per CNN.
Written by Axios
Follow this Action Center to stay updated on new posts
Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested 41 people who had come forward as potential sponsors of undocumented migrant children. 70% of those arrests were due to the sponsors. A police state coming to a community near you! Immigrants are not the problem it is the racist bias, hate and fear! Had that in nazi Germany and other countries. You can not fix the problem in this country, you have to go and fix the problem, where the problem starts, Central and South America. It would be a lot cheaper.
Is this a serious question? Maybe the question writer needs to ascertain what laws are involved. For myself, my answer is yes based on existing laws. So the question be: Should The Border Patrol/ICE ignore written US Law? Should sworn officers determine the meaning of laws based on their personal feelings on immigration or ”support the Constitution”? If Congress passes laws, should the electorate support Congress or follow their heart?
If they are here illegally or have outstanding warrants of course they should be arrested. We need to send a message that if you want to immigrate to the USA you have to use the proper procedure. You don't get to jump the queue by breaking the law. Think about the people who are trying to immigrate legally. Their processing is being delayed. On the issue of political assylum: There is a serious issue of people being displaced, but dumping everyone in one area is a huge drain on resources for the receiving country. In the case of asylum seekers, there should be a common application where seekers can choose multiple options (much like the common application to colleges in the USA). This could lessen the burden on any individual country and speed up the process to find asylum seekers a safe living environment. The idea may not be ideal, but neither is living in constant fear in your own country.
If you would reasonably expect ANY other fugitive to be arrested (bank robber, drug dealer, embezzler, inside stock trader, car thief, whatever) then you should not be surprised when THESE fugitive invaders get scooped up as well. How can you POSSIBLY be okay with releasing CHILDREN into the custody of WANTED CRIMINALS?!? What kind of monster are you?